'THE SHAPE IN QUESTION DOESN’T DIVERGE CONSIDERABLY FROM THE NORM OR WHAT’S USUAL IN THAT SECTOR'
Vibrator With 3 Balls Can’t Win EU Trademark, Court Says
(Thanks to Unholy Slacker)
« Previous | Main | Next »
January 22, 2013
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
I am so not going to open that at work. But just wait til I get home :)
Posted by: ubetcha | January 22, 2013 at 09:43 AM
I'm trying to figure out exactly how this would work.
Posted by: nursecindy | January 22, 2013 at 10:27 AM
Yes, nc. "...the vibrator’s shape was functional and adapted to the human body..."
My imagination is having fun with this, but it doesn't seem up to the job.
Posted by: Steve | January 22, 2013 at 10:33 AM
In France or Italy, it'd be given AOC or DOC status. And next week, Robert Parker would be comparing it unfavorably to some California- produced fruit bomb.
Posted by: Omniskeptic | January 22, 2013 at 11:43 AM
Maybe if Miss Bardot endorsed it...?
Posted by: Clankie | January 22, 2013 at 12:05 PM
I'm pickin' up good vibrations....
Posted by: Ralph | January 22, 2013 at 03:16 PM
Eddie Torres? Does it arrive in a low rider space ship?
Posted by: Make It Rain | January 22, 2013 at 06:00 PM