« Previous | Main | Next »
January 20, 2013
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
That is a Charmin story.
Posted by: MikeyVA | January 20, 2013 at 11:52 AM
Is there a problem, Offizier?
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | January 20, 2013 at 12:43 PM
'Cops spied on each other to nab loo roll thief'
I saw Loo Rolls open for Johnny Cash
( ♫ You'll never find - Who's swiping from behind...)
Posted by: ligirl | January 20, 2013 at 01:00 PM
What can you expect in a state whose name sounds like something J.R.R. Tolkien came up with?
Posted by: Omniskeptic | January 20, 2013 at 01:22 PM
It would have more upsetting if one of their coworkers was NOT using toilet paper.
Probably more easily detected, too.
Posted by: Steve | January 20, 2013 at 01:54 PM
Can't decide if the loo roll in the photo is an over or an under. Going to bother me all day.
Posted by: Jan in Grimsby | January 20, 2013 at 02:29 PM
What a sheety development.
Posted by: Clankie | January 20, 2013 at 04:58 PM
Kinda rubs me the wrong way to hear about police spying on each other in the crapper.
Posted by: Joe in Japan | January 21, 2013 at 01:07 AM
The Cops were stymied because they didn't have anything to go on.
Posted by: SavetheRepublic | January 21, 2013 at 04:07 PM
Sooo... they really were criminal police?
Posted by: Richard the Weasel-Hearted | January 21, 2013 at 10:43 PM