FASHION FOR "MEN"
(Thanks to Alkali Bill)
« Previous | Main | Next »
January 28, 2013
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
he looks miserable, wonder why?
Posted by: maryqos | January 28, 2013 at 02:14 PM
I'm sure I don't need to tell this multi-lingual and erudite group what "Comme des garçons" means. These don't look like any boys I know. They do look really emo, though.
Posted by: Omniskeptic | January 28, 2013 at 02:20 PM
The saddest part of that page is in the upper right corner: "1 of 48"
Posted by: padraig | January 28, 2013 at 02:23 PM
Oddly enough, the least objectionable thing was the ww1 german helmet with the bunny ears
Posted by: Hammond Rye | January 28, 2013 at 02:51 PM
I can totally see Brad Pitt wearing this stuff.
Posted by: HogsAteMySister | January 28, 2013 at 03:10 PM
"he looks miserable, wonder why?"
It's because he's thinking: " I guess I my dream of becoming an astronaut is over..."
Posted by: Alkali Bill | January 28, 2013 at 03:57 PM
Dressed to surrender.
Posted by: mazar larry | January 28, 2013 at 03:59 PM
The Boy Scouts are discussing considering changing the uniforms.
Posted by: mazar larry | January 28, 2013 at 04:10 PM
mazar, the Scouts did say today that they'd consider letting gay folks join up. Coincidence?
Posted by: padraig | January 28, 2013 at 04:58 PM
Is that a fake mullet? Tell me it is not a fake mullet under his weird Mickey Mouse-like ears.
Posted by: Elon | January 28, 2013 at 05:02 PM
Well, I think you blog guys would look fabulous in some of those outfits. Post pictures.
Posted by: nursecindy | January 28, 2013 at 06:29 PM
There dads must be so proud.
Posted by: JD | January 28, 2013 at 07:13 PM
There's a whole stretch of stuff in that slideshow (I clicked all the way through, because I'm bored) that looks like it might have been stolen from Paula Poundstone's closet.
Posted by: Captain Spoilsport | January 28, 2013 at 08:04 PM
Garçons means dweeb now...?
Posted by: Clankie | January 28, 2013 at 08:13 PM
Yes, bloglits, haute couteur fashion designers hate les garçons as much as they hate les femmes.
Posted by: Spiny Norman | January 28, 2013 at 09:34 PM
Shouldn't that be "las femmes"?
Posted by: Toto | January 28, 2013 at 09:54 PM
Those are the homeliest women I have ever seen.
Posted by: Anon and Anon | January 28, 2013 at 10:52 PM
These guys all look like they are coming down after a 3 day bender on heroin after being forced to listen to David Bowie music, or perhaps engaging in a bit of the old ultra-violence down at the local milk-bar?
Posted by: PirateBoy | January 28, 2013 at 11:05 PM
Are you sure those are men's clothes? Those models look like girls to me ... I mean despite the whole "commes des garcon" thing.
Posted by: RobinGoodfellow | January 28, 2013 at 11:26 PM
They look like homeless women. I have never understood "high" fashion. But at least they dress the men as bizarrely as they dress the women.
Posted by: Sheherazahde | January 29, 2013 at 03:05 AM
Death before dishonor.
Posted by: Cheesewiz | January 29, 2013 at 08:25 AM
Les Miserables?
Posted by: MikeyVA | January 29, 2013 at 09:15 AM
NYT said I could not look at any more of their crap with out paying 99 cents. I am devastated, it's not worth that much to me.
Posted by: Ken_in_SC (@Ken_in_SC) | January 29, 2013 at 03:01 PM
Ken -There is a way to cheat the system.
Posted by: Elon | January 29, 2013 at 09:14 PM
No. No. Hell No.
Posted by: Loudmouth | January 29, 2013 at 10:55 PM