« Previous | Main | Next »
November 06, 2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Send it over Michael Moore's backyard pool for a glimpse of aerial Shamu.
Posted by: Clankazoid | November 06, 2012 at 12:45 PM
Not likin' to be a killjoy er nuthin' of that sort ... but ... this "response" of the "scientific community" seems a bit odd ...
If the "regular" scientists think the search for Bigfoot makes its proponents a Laughingstock, I'd think they'd welcome the use of any/all "Scientific Technology and Tools" (IR, aerial searches, state-of-the-art photography and video, to mention a few) to DISprove the existence of critters of this type ... but they're against usin' "science" to prove (or disprove) sumthin' "scientific" ... or "mythical" ... whutever ...
Gotta be the jealousy of "scientists" in their constant hunt for "truth" ... or "grant money" ...
Posted by: O the Umanity | November 06, 2012 at 01:11 PM
I am holding my Sasquatch right now. They don't need a dirigible to get a good photo.
Posted by: HogsAteMySister | November 06, 2012 at 01:46 PM
I think he was in the early voting line ahead of me in Aurora, Illinois. He had a valid ID (well, valid enough for voting in Illinois) that showed his name as Chad.
He asked how to use the large typeface version of the electronic ballot. I saw him drive off in a Chevy Volt.
Posted by: Not My Usual Alias | November 06, 2012 at 02:37 PM
Even if I thought there was reason to search for bigfoot (which I don't) I would have serious doubts about using a dirigible in the mountains. They are very susceptible to wind, and the mountains tend to have a lot of it.
Posted by: pogo | November 06, 2012 at 02:53 PM
O the U, it makes you a scientific laughingstock because there is no evidence Bigfoot exists. It's not worth the time investment to chase after ghosts, no matter how good the equipment is. Not to mention the fact that this professor is probably absolutely certain Bigfoot does exist and will latch on to whatever "shred" of evidence he finds as if it were ironclad proof.
Posted by: Elon | November 06, 2012 at 03:58 PM
Why am I laughing so hard at HogAte..Sis comment ? (My office mates will know I'm not working) Have we not progressed beyond 7th grade ?
Posted by: LeDud | November 06, 2012 at 04:04 PM
Just send the money to me and I will take care of it!
Posted by: Riverview Dude | November 06, 2012 at 04:08 PM
I will even send them a self addressed stamped envelope!
Posted by: Riverview Dude | November 06, 2012 at 04:09 PM
*LeDud*
I asked Sasquatch.
No, we have not progressed beyond seventh grade.
Which, in many measurable ways, is just tragic.
Posted by: HogsAteMySister | November 06, 2012 at 05:28 PM
Das Blimpit?
(OK, Geezer Bus tickets to those who spot that reference).
Bueller?
Stickle?
Anybody?
Posted by: PirateBoy | November 06, 2012 at 11:13 PM
I wear size 13 shoes. Does that count?
And no comments or questions from the ladies, please.
No, there is no demonstrable correlation at all. There. I answered it.
Posted by: Steve | November 07, 2012 at 10:36 AM
PirateBoy - Don Knotts!
Posted by: ubetcha | November 07, 2012 at 02:30 PM