« Previous | Main | Next »
October 09, 2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
She definitely has this blog's support.
Send her to Washington!
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | October 09, 2012 at 08:36 AM
I must have misunderstood the article.
Where was the large group of people who are against drugs standing?
Posted by: Steve | October 09, 2012 at 09:24 AM
*snort*
Posted by: ligirl | October 09, 2012 at 09:25 AM
oops
'course i meant *snork*
Posted by: ligirl | October 09, 2012 at 09:26 AM
I tried snorting Coke once.
Almost drowned.
Posted by: wiredog | October 09, 2012 at 10:11 AM
Do NOT send her to Washington. I think we have quite enough coke snorters there already. Not to mention the apparently huge amount of hallucinogens that goes into the budgeting process.
Posted by: padraig | October 09, 2012 at 10:16 AM
Heck, our politicians merely promise us pie-in-the-sky (or back seat) ... I guess we're way behind the times, eh?
Posted by: O the Umanity | October 09, 2012 at 10:24 AM
What's all this talk about FREE elections?
In Chicago they freakin' pay you to vote.
Posted by: poker | October 09, 2012 at 10:26 AM
it's heartwarming. many dead folks here in albany do vote. really. what could be wrong with that?
Posted by: queensbee | October 09, 2012 at 10:27 AM
Right, q'b' ... they's merely expressin' an opinion that they din't have time to articulate prior to their demise ...
Posted by: O the Umanity | October 09, 2012 at 10:36 AM
She'd get my vote.
Posted by: Tony Montana | October 09, 2012 at 10:59 AM
Now q'b'. Don't think of them as dead. They're actually 'living challenged' which would actually make them disabled voters. So a candidate that is elected based on their votes could honestly say he is supported by the disabled persons in their district. If they became 'living challenged' after the age of 70 he could also say he had the support of the elderly. OMG, I think I just turned into a politician! Quick, somebody turn me back!
Posted by: nursecindy | October 09, 2012 at 11:14 AM
That should keep her poll numbers high.
Posted by: Clankie | October 09, 2012 at 11:33 AM
Clankie: something or somebody's gonna be high, at any rate.
Posted by: Dmentd | October 09, 2012 at 12:35 PM
Send nursecindy to Washington!
Posted by: Wolfsong | October 09, 2012 at 01:15 PM