« Previous | Main | Next »
September 17, 2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

“Ninety nine per cent of the time, the owls will think the person is a squirrel said Dick."
So these scientists know what Owls will think?
Posted by: Cheesewiz | September 17, 2012 at 01:53 PM
Guess owls don't have "eyes like a hawk."
Posted by: mazar larry | September 17, 2012 at 02:23 PM
Shouldn't be too hard to train those owls to go after guys with mullets.
Then we can unleash a whole flock on a Lynrd Skynrd concert. Mwah-hah-ha-ha-hahhhhhhhh!
Posted by: padraig | September 17, 2012 at 03:04 PM
BTW, up until now I thought Mindy Dick was a regional sub-variation on Spotted Dick. The things ya learn around here...
Posted by: padraig | September 17, 2012 at 03:06 PM
And I thought the owls thought they were going after beavers. Stupid me.
Posted by: LeDud | September 17, 2012 at 03:46 PM
How appropriate.
I went into the barn this morning and found that a squirrel had gotten into a wood-storage system I built.
Instead of running off terrified, she got up on a beam and blessed me like a Bishop.
My wife suggested a plastic owl but I wasn't sure they ate animals as big as that squirrel.
Nice to know.
Posted by: Steve | September 17, 2012 at 04:20 PM
The warning is only to women. While I agree that men with ponytails deserve whatever the owls do to them, it is strange to see a public official be so open about holding that view.
Posted by: max | September 17, 2012 at 04:34 PM
Are we sure the owls weren't carrying an envelope?
Posted by: Ralph | September 17, 2012 at 05:33 PM
O.K. why wasn't this story covered under the blogs strict policy? HHHMMM!
Posted by: Dum Bass | September 17, 2012 at 05:49 PM
If the owl wasn't barred before, it is now. Haw, haw.
Sorry.
Posted by: Omniskeptic | September 17, 2012 at 10:16 PM