THE REVOLT HAS BEGUN
Two men shot by their own dogs, 'accidentally'
(Thanks to Jeff Meyerson)
(Thanks to Jeff Meyerson)
« Previous | Main | Next »
September 18, 2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
This is what happens when you "dress them up."
They wait, they watch, they shoot.
Posted by: MikeyVA | September 18, 2012 at 10:19 AM
Exactly, Mikey.
Be careful, cindy. They are biding their time.
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | September 18, 2012 at 10:36 AM
Perhaps the guy needed shootin'. There are lot in need of that...especially ones who lie about their dog shooting them. The truth is probably that the hunting buddy of the guy in Utah shot him (the dog's owner, not the dog) and they fabricated the story. This is what matters: It wasn't an accident, it was negligence. A firearm should always be in the minimum state of readiness. So the gun should have been unloaded (or action open or, at the very least, safety on). There is NO WAY a dog could disable the safety AND pull the trigger.
Posted by: Mac Demere | September 18, 2012 at 01:13 PM
I have a sneaking suspicion that the French hunter was shot by a German shepherd; high alert to be declared.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | September 18, 2012 at 02:10 PM
Ron White says, "You can't fix stupid." maybe the dog was trying to prove him wrong.
Posted by: rickh | September 18, 2012 at 03:36 PM
Another vote for "not accident." Surprised Cheney didn't think of something like this to explain his hunting gone wrong.
Posted by: mazar larry | September 19, 2012 at 12:44 PM