« Previous | Main | Next »
August 01, 2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Will the sport ever recover from this outrage? Say it ain't so Yu-Wang!
Posted by: WVplantman | August 01, 2012 at 01:01 PM
I don't honestly see what is wrong with strategic losing. They weren't gambling on the matches; they threw them because the rules gave the losing teams better seeds in the finals.That is a legitimate strategy. How is it cheating?
Posted by: Elon | August 01, 2012 at 01:10 PM
as fine a display of shuttlecock-whacking as I have seen in some time
I thought whacking your shuttlecock in public was illegal?
In my younger days the crowd I ran with would occasionally engage in bouts of coed naked badminton. Usually just one set. During which the guys would see the girls bouncy bits and drool, and they would see our bouncy bits and laugh.
Posted by: wiredog | August 01, 2012 at 01:13 PM
I, for one, am glad to learn that Tanyaporn has found a new sport after her figure skating debacle.
Posted by: random thunking | August 01, 2012 at 01:18 PM
The Shuttlecock Whackers wbagnfarb. Great article Dave and I totally agree with you about cut and paste.
Posted by: nursecindy | August 01, 2012 at 01:20 PM
well
ya jes never know what a shuttlecocke'll do...
......dle-do
Posted by: ligirl | August 01, 2012 at 01:45 PM
Now that Penn State's football program is in the bin, perhaps they will direct their energies to becoming a force in the world of badminton.
Posted by: Clankie | August 01, 2012 at 01:54 PM
Elon, it's only deemed cheating because it makes the organizers look bad for choosing a format where such actions could be advantageous. Because in the end, the unwritten first ideal of the Olympic Spirit is, "never make the people who write the rules look bad".
Posted by: KJP | August 01, 2012 at 02:19 PM
I'm tellin' you, stick with Calvinball.
Posted by: Omniskeptic | August 01, 2012 at 02:27 PM
I think it has something to do with the metric system, and I say to hell with it.
Posted by: Ms. Flukey | August 01, 2012 at 02:35 PM
I used cut-and-paste for Badminton.
So can we call this scandal BadmintonGate?
Posted by: Not My Usual Alias | August 01, 2012 at 02:41 PM
Losing on purpose when it is to your advantage is called gamemanship, which some consider totally acceptable. On the other hand it is very poor sportmanship and shows a lack of respect for your opponents, the viewers and the sport. The association never called it "cheating" and I applaud them for their actions. Now please get off my lawn, and take your badminton floss with you.
Posted by: WVplantman | August 01, 2012 at 02:50 PM
snork @ random up there - Tanyaporn. hee hee.
Posted by: Guin | August 01, 2012 at 04:04 PM
I'm still waiting to hear how Hong Kong Phooey does in the judo competition.
Posted by: padraig | August 01, 2012 at 04:11 PM
BTW, disqualifying someone for losing -- isn't that right up there with suspending students for skipping class, logically speaking?
Posted by: padraig | August 01, 2012 at 04:13 PM
good point, padraig.
And it's kind of like jailing someone for breaking into the jail.
Posted by: JD | August 01, 2012 at 04:21 PM
Not at all. Here they were ALLOWED and ENCOURAGED to lose, and then were thrown out on some made-up disciplinary charge. There was no official rule against strategic flopping. There is an official rule about playing hooky.
You have to do things by the book. Otherwise, it is the judges with the incentive to cheat.
Posted by: Elon | August 01, 2012 at 04:28 PM
I thought that whacking ones birdie in public was illegal in all places except Washington DC.
Oh and WEST VA, Sorry WVplantman.
Posted by: MikeyVA (NOT WEST VA) | August 01, 2012 at 04:59 PM
Omniskeptic, Calvinball RULES!
I miss that little guy and his terrific tiger more every day - Bill Watterson's way of combining wit and wisdom is rare, indeed.
*Now I'm going to go re-read all my Calvin & Hobbes books.*
Posted by: klezmerphan | August 01, 2012 at 05:27 PM
C&H are the best. Too bad Watterson said he won't write another comic book.
Posted by: Elon | August 02, 2012 at 01:54 AM
But klezmer, you're in an opposite zone, so you have to read them backwards until someone finds the spot of reversing ...
Posted by: Omniskeptic | August 02, 2012 at 07:09 AM