WHICH IS WHY WE MUST ALWAYS KEEP AN EYE ON THEM
Female Breasts Are Bigger Than Ever, But Under Threat
(Thanks to jon harris)
« Previous | Main | Next »
May 07, 2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
That's probably more than I ever wanted to know about breasts.
Posted by: nursecindy | May 07, 2012 at 03:09 PM
I'm with nursecindy. We need less coverage of breasts.
Posted by: Just Some Guy | May 07, 2012 at 03:19 PM
I disagree, JSG. I think the entire issue needs to be exposed.
Posted by: Layzeeboy | May 07, 2012 at 03:29 PM
The 'breasts can kill you' lady again. This woman has a tit-for-tat vendetta going.
Posted by: Loudmouth | May 07, 2012 at 04:05 PM
I am relieved to know that infants will not be busting into flames, thanks to the flame retardant in breast milk.
Posted by: Horace LaBadie | May 07, 2012 at 05:57 PM
I do my bit.
Posted by: Mxymaster | May 07, 2012 at 06:26 PM
Poisoned babies suck.
Posted by: Ralph | May 07, 2012 at 06:39 PM
After the first sentence, this article went rapidly downhill: "Funbags, blah, blah, blah, Ginger..."
Posted by: Allen at Division | May 07, 2012 at 07:43 PM
Horace, the flame retardant is all that keeps the rocket fuel from igniting!
Posted by: wiredog | May 08, 2012 at 09:02 AM