ATTENTION, NOBEL PRIZE JUDGES
University researchers have proven, mathematically, that physics is hard.
(Thanks to Jay Brandes)
« Previous | Main | Next »
University researchers have proven, mathematically, that physics is hard.
(Thanks to Jay Brandes)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Actually it's pretty easy until you get to Schroedinger and that damned cat. After that it all goes to hell.
Posted by: pogo | May 11, 2012 at 09:07 AM
So, does 1+1 equal 11 or not?
Posted by: Horace LaBadie | May 11, 2012 at 09:09 AM
No, Horace, it equals 10.
Posted by: DrPat | May 11, 2012 at 09:10 AM
"...others, such as optimization problems of logistics in freight transport...."
This is classically called "The Traveling Salesman Problem" or "TSP." Concise English is hard too.
Posted by: Ralph | May 11, 2012 at 09:18 AM
Toby Cubitt proves that Toby Cubitt is mathematically Toby Cubitt except for the times Toby Cubitt is not Toby Cubitt because Toby Cubitt could not prove mathematically Toby Cubitt's existence to Toby Cubitt.
Posted by: Loudmouth | May 11, 2012 at 09:30 AM
Doesn't the Traveling Salesman Problem involve The Farmer's Daughter?
Posted by: Horace LaBadie | May 11, 2012 at 09:40 AM
No Horace, 1+1=-2*e^(i*π)
Posted by: wiredog | May 11, 2012 at 09:42 AM
Physics is hard, and painful and unforgiving, especially that gravity stuff. Plus, they still haven't figured out how the f**k magnets work.
Posted by: padraig | May 11, 2012 at 10:07 AM
Physics is
harddifficult?Nah ... Ontogeny recapitulates Phyogeny. Mobius said that, long ago, and the conclusion therefrom is Intuitively Obvious ... every Math student with a modicum of common sense knows that. The Proof is in the Pudding. Or Putting. Whutever.
Posted by: O the Umanity | May 11, 2012 at 10:10 AM
I had a kid ask me the other day to help with her math homework. I had already done her English homework so I just put my foot down and told her that the only way she would learn is to do it herself. Sometimes you just have to get tough. Besides, math is not my thing and I wouldn't know how to do averages if someone put a gun to my head. I am pretty good at percentages. Especially when a shoe sale is involved.
Posted by: nursecindy | May 11, 2012 at 10:41 AM
What're the odds!?
Posted by: Curtis E Flush | May 11, 2012 at 10:54 AM
I think, therefore my brain hurts. Or was it the other way around?
Posted by: Omniskeptic | May 11, 2012 at 11:41 AM
P'haps, Omni' ... or mebbe it's the fact that ...
OW!
Now MY brain hurts!
Posted by: O the Umanity | May 11, 2012 at 11:56 AM
this will doubtlessly find its way into the Ig-Noble awards in the fall. awarded at MIT i think. google Ig-noble and you can see previous winners, all champions! (great for science nerds)
Posted by: queensbee | May 11, 2012 at 12:14 PM
As a physics teacher/instructor, etc. I must say! Wimps!!!!!!!!
Posted by: MikeyVA | May 11, 2012 at 01:22 PM
Math is hard!
Posted by: Barbie | May 11, 2012 at 01:33 PM
A good man is hard to find, and visa versa.
Posted by: MikeyVA | May 11, 2012 at 01:39 PM
A quantum physicist says that physics is hard?
There are two types of physicists, hard physicists and soft physicists. Hard physicists study things which can actually be measured like the effects of gravity and how many electrons can dance on the head of a pin. Soft physicists come up with silly ideas that no one can test like "if a particle could travel faster than light who would it vote for on American Idol" and "is there a gravitationally induced temperature gradient in an insulated fluid column at equilibrium situated in a gravitational field"*. This quantum physicist says that hard physics and other hard sciences are easy and his type of soft physics is too hard for computers because computers can only deal with things which are real instead of wild guesses.
*I am informed that recently hard physicists have caught up with the soft physicists' Loschmidt and Boltzmann/Maxwell dispute of the late 19th century and that Loschmidt was right, there is a temperature gradient. This might annoy the quantum physicists and other soft physicists who have spent a century and half building up theories based upon Boltzman & Maxwell being correct. Now they have to turn another branch over to computers and hard physicists who will discover that every thing the soft physicists said was wrong, and start campaigning to get American Idol canceled before the hard physicists with the easy job can discover a faster-than-light particle.
Posted by: max | May 11, 2012 at 02:05 PM
max ... I'm really glad y'all cleared that up ... now I can sleep better @ night ...
Posted by: O the Umanity | May 11, 2012 at 02:38 PM
max - while you are in there, strangle Schroedinger AND his damned cat. Then there won't be any uncertainty about it.
Posted by: pogo | May 11, 2012 at 02:56 PM
Highsenberg, Lowsenberg. Who knows? (spell check actually has Heisenberg in it, who knew?)
Posted by: Loudmouth | May 11, 2012 at 08:18 PM
What is Physics?
Thank you.
Posted by: Ted the Professor | May 13, 2012 at 05:35 AM