« Previous | Main | Next »
May 01, 2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
I would say he has a legal case.
Except that you have to be able to prove you had more damage after the event than before. And that could be a sticking point.
Posted by: Steve | May 01, 2012 at 08:24 AM
I'm guessing they did a brain scan and found nothing.
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | May 01, 2012 at 08:28 AM
A true numbskull.
Posted by: nursecindy | May 01, 2012 at 09:41 AM
*snork* at Steve's "sticking point"
Posted by: ubetcha | May 01, 2012 at 09:48 AM
The question is: Should he try to get tazed again, and make sure he gets it in the left lobe? This way, he gets the "benefit" of a full lobotomy without any
surgery!
Posted by: funny man | May 01, 2012 at 10:29 AM
maybe he was over at the assn for the blind...
Posted by: queensbee | May 01, 2012 at 11:35 AM
But tasers are non-lethal, right? I mean, he didn't die or anything. What's he complaining about?
Posted by: Omniskeptic | May 01, 2012 at 12:03 PM
From the original article:
"There’s a moral in this story somewhere but damned if I can find it."
followed by a comment by Jim:
"The only moral to the story is that you do not put yourself in a compromising situation that could invite police intervention."
Posted by: Ernie G | May 01, 2012 at 12:54 PM
Must be one of those people for whom the brain is not a particularly vital organ.
But, on the bright side, he came back from the hospital with a vastly improved haircut.
Posted by: padraig | May 01, 2012 at 03:39 PM