« Previous | Main | Next »
April 25, 2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
It was a BBQ store, right?
Posted by: Loudmouth | April 25, 2012 at 08:41 AM
Darn those squirrels!
Posted by: Just Some Guy | April 25, 2012 at 09:00 AM
A three pipe problem.
Posted by: Horace LaBadie | April 25, 2012 at 09:22 AM
Investigators believe, oh hell, you know, that stuff was involved ... that brown stuff ... no, not whiskey, you idiot. Oh, what is the word. There's a federal agency ... Alcohol, what's-its name, and Firearms. It'll come to me.
Posted by: Omniskeptic | April 25, 2012 at 09:30 AM
Damn ball lightning!
Posted by: Punkin | April 25, 2012 at 09:32 AM
The CSI's would have cleared it by now, but they're busy investigating how an eye got poked out at the big Running With Scissors marathon.
Posted by: padraig | April 25, 2012 at 09:59 AM
I blame Global Warming.
Posted by: Dan S. | April 25, 2012 at 10:12 AM
With three hundreds types of tobacco ash, they will have no problem identifying the culprit.
Posted by: Horace LaBadie | April 25, 2012 at 10:22 AM
*snork* at Horace, twice!
The answer is elementary.
Posted by: Ms. Flukey | April 25, 2012 at 10:54 AM
By the time they arrived on the scene, large amounts of smoke were coming from the rear of the building, he said.
Gas buildup? WHenn I have smoke coming from my rear,
it's either because I had gas, or some really smokin'
BBQ!
Posted by: funny man | April 25, 2012 at 11:02 AM
Squirrels again? I bet they were trying to heat their nuts.
Posted by: funny man | April 25, 2012 at 11:08 AM
Altogether, the building is considered to be a total loss, Graves said.
The building is considered to be a total loss.
Posted by: MOTW | April 25, 2012 at 01:02 PM