CLASSY
A commemoration of the Titanic features a giant urinating puppet.
(Thanks to funny man)
« Previous | Main | Next »
A commemoration of the Titanic features a giant urinating puppet.
(Thanks to funny man)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Isn't this dumb for a statue?
Posted by: Theresa | April 22, 2012 at 05:43 PM
I disagree. When I hear a touching story about an uncle searching in vain for his daughter, urinating colossi are the first things that come to mind.
Posted by: Elon | April 22, 2012 at 05:43 PM
Can we borrow that for the political conventions this Summer ?
Posted by: Clankie | April 22, 2012 at 05:46 PM
Patrick Smith, a puppeteer from Royal De Luxe, said: "We have had a pleasant walk with the giants in Liverpool and met many people along the way.
"Many people were really surprised when the Little Girl Giant urinated but a lot of them were delighted and they shouted as if it was a Beatles' show.
"It's what little girl do - even giant little girls - and all of the giants have many other surprises in store for the people of Liverpool."
I am reliably informed that little girls sh|t, too.
Why not try that next?
Posted by: Will (the other one) | April 22, 2012 at 05:47 PM
The French (somehow) were (apparently) behind this ... why should we be surprised?
I had another thot, but it's disrespectful ... toward the "creators" that obviously hold the memory of those who died in very low esteem ... so I won't say it here ... but I'll think it ...
Posted by: O the Umanity | April 22, 2012 at 05:51 PM
Sigh..
Posted by: Elon | April 22, 2012 at 05:54 PM
the french approved? 'oui oui'!
Posted by: ligirl | April 22, 2012 at 06:16 PM
Sunk to a new low?
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | April 22, 2012 at 06:28 PM
The French consulate staff were laughung their heads off, saying "I urinate in your general direction"...
Posted by: funny man | April 22, 2012 at 06:44 PM
I'd rather watch a giant puppet urinate all day long than hear "My Heart Will Go On" even one more time.
Posted by: padraig | April 22, 2012 at 07:56 PM
Maybe the "...creators of the Sea Odyssey giants..." should sit in chairs under the giant's rear end, since it appears they are indistinguishable from ...
Posted by: Steve | April 22, 2012 at 08:15 PM
Proving the arts aren't totally devoid in Great Britain. Mmm, not so much.
Posted by: Loudmouth | April 22, 2012 at 09:43 PM
Liverpool, Capital of Culture. Well if that's your idea of culture then I'm proud to call myself an uncultured lout.
Posted by: max | April 22, 2012 at 11:23 PM
Are urinating puppets related to auroras around Uranus?
Posted by: Ralph | April 23, 2012 at 01:48 AM
Seems that the one that soiled her pants was busy in Blackpool.
Posted by: Horace LaBadie | April 23, 2012 at 09:22 AM
And here we have an interesting example of the early 21st century goddess, Urea. It is generally believed that it was the central figure in a population dominated by older men with prostate problems.
Posted by: Betsy | April 23, 2012 at 10:55 AM
"It's what little girl do - even giant little girls - and all of the giants have many other surprises in store for the people of Liverpool."
It's what little girls do? In public? Really?
No wonder parts of
ParisFrance stink.Should we be encouraging young girls to do this (publically)?
To me "other surprises" sounds like war has been declared.
Posted by: funny man | April 23, 2012 at 11:08 AM
I am absolutely with pad on the whole "preferring pee to Celine" thing.
Also, Uncle O, I will say that I don't think disrespect is intended, even if it's not how we would choose to depict a celebratory event. I could see how they would think that part a bit of whimsy or even realism depending on their viewpoint.
Just because it doesn't appeal to me doesn't make it not art, you know?
Posted by: Diva | April 23, 2012 at 11:19 AM
yeah, i suppose flowers and church music would be a fitting remembrance of the dead folk - but who would pay attention to that? and whose to say that you couldn't choose the wrong flowers, (or music) and still get somebody's nose out of joint?
if you don't like art, make better art.
Posted by: mudstuffin in klumbus | April 23, 2012 at 12:23 PM
FTR, I wuzn't worried about disrespect fer the victims, merely that my disrespect fer the "artists" might be construed as such directed @ them that perished ... y'all know Moi ... cautious and polite ... (and it wuz really sorta snidely nasty) ...
Whut?
Posted by: O the Umanity | April 23, 2012 at 01:02 PM
O the U...If I had to hazard a guess, I'd say that they started from the premise of "how to depict innocent life, of the kind that was lost"...and what could be more innocent than a small child who's so carefree and unabashed that she pees wherever she is?
That said, I'm afraid I had to think a LONG time to get there, after my initial reaction of "Back to the Pull-Up Pampers; and who's gong to pay for THIS colossal dry-cleaning bill?"
Posted by: Betsy | April 23, 2012 at 05:05 PM
Diva said:- "Just because it doesn't appeal to me doesn't make it not art, you know?"
To which I respond that just because one can do it doesn't mean that one should.
Posted by: Brucek | April 23, 2012 at 06:50 PM
What does an incontinence child have to do with the Titanic disaster?
Posted by: Make It Rain | April 23, 2012 at 08:18 PM