WAIT... WHOSE WIFE? THE JUDGE'S?
Judge Orders Florida Man To Take His Wife on a Date
(Thanks to Unholy Slacker, funny man, Jeff Meyerson. Janice Gelb and Another Ralph)
« Previous | Main | Next »
February 08, 2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Is the judge willing to pay for a sitter too?
Posted by: Gary | February 08, 2012 at 06:33 PM
Romantic dinner then bowling. Is that the judge's idea of a date or the wife's choice?
Gotta say, at least the judge is using some actual judgement instead of the usual kneejerk "one-size fits all" decrees.
Posted by: Loudmouth | February 08, 2012 at 06:36 PM
If grabbing her neck is "very, very minor" what does the judge consider major?
nursecindy wants to know
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | February 08, 2012 at 06:45 PM
This could be considered cruel and unusual punishment if he is allergic to seafood.
There is no question about "unusual".
Posted by: oneblankspace | February 08, 2012 at 06:50 PM
I agree Jeff but in this case I agree with the judge. I'm not sure the bowling is a good idea though. My ex was a wonderful bowler. In fact he had several 300 games. However, when the bowling wasn't going well I stayed away from him because he got extremely angry. Wouldn't a movie have been a better idea? And next time tell her Happy Birthday!
Posted by: nursecindy | February 08, 2012 at 07:47 PM
So ... did the judge happen to mention (suggest?) the handiest Lover's Lane where they could stop after the bowling?
Posted by: O the Umanity | February 08, 2012 at 07:57 PM
What happens if the wife is allergic to seafood or hates bowling?
Posted by: Elon | February 08, 2012 at 08:04 PM
Pay Fabio to do it.
Posted by: Clankie | February 08, 2012 at 08:10 PM
Oh Fabio. *deep sigh*
Posted by: nursecindy | February 08, 2012 at 10:14 PM
"A romantic meal at Red Lobster." I just do not consider that combination of words to make any sense. Nothing against Red Lobster, I've even taken a few dates there back in the long ago, but if Red Lobster meets the judge's concept of romantic I expect the judge has his own marital problems.
Posted by: max | February 08, 2012 at 10:29 PM
Take her bowling where? I thought the Giants already won the bowling game.
Posted by: Ralph | February 08, 2012 at 11:15 PM
Giants bowling? Isn't that whut woke up (or put to sleep?) Rip Van Winkle?
Posted by: O the Umanity | February 08, 2012 at 11:38 PM
Heck, in some parts of Bama, (cause I got relatives there), ya take someone to the lobster, then to bowl, and next step is the chapel.
I don't agree with calling that 'romantic' but to
"eechh" his
honorown...Posted by: funny man | February 09, 2012 at 09:56 AM
Sorry -- I would find the guy guilty of domestic abuse if he DID take her to Red Lobster, allergies notwithstanding.
Posted by: Omniskeptic | February 10, 2012 at 10:39 PM