« Previous | Main | Next »

August 26, 2011

AND THE SO-CALLED 'UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL' DOES NOTHING

Victoria's Secret Model's Privates Bruised By Panties

(Thanks to Mark Schlesinger)

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

nobody, indeed...

"This is not cohesive to get a man. No man wants a scratchy vagina.”

And I'm sure she speaks from vast experience...NTTAWWT.

I do question her use of "cohesive" however. Not really sure what point she was driving at, but let me study the picture for an hour or two and I'll get back to you.


Yet another article run solely for the purpose of the accompanying photographs.

I have the exact same problem with my diamond encrusted Victoria's Secret undies! I use baby powder.

In a pinch, we will settle for a scratchy vagina. Whut?

Jeff, if you're done studying the picture, I think she meant "conducive." Just a guess. Not that I'm sayin' anything about this girl's vocabulary.

This is the very reason why Wal-Mart doesn't stock this item.

I feel obligated to point out that if her panties bruised her vagina,* she's wearing them wrong. What she almost certainly means is her vulva.

*Latin for "scabbard," which tells you something, doesn't it?

This woman is in trouble! Stand back everyone while I perform CPR! (that stands for Cardio -- [ Comment deleted for vulgar abbreviations.]

I saw the Vulgar Abbreviations open for the Sex Pistols.

When did we abandon the completely proper convention of calling all this stuff " unmentionables " ?

Clankie, too many people kept mentioning them.

The comments to this entry are closed.

-
 
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Copyright | About The Miami Herald | Advertise