« Previous | Main | Next »
March 25, 2011
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
... oooh, the images are just toooo great!
Posted by: Kibby F5™ | March 25, 2011 at 09:48 AM
For once PETA is on the right side of an issue!
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | March 25, 2011 at 09:56 AM
Yes, but were they wearing fur?
Posted by: bonmot | March 25, 2011 at 10:30 AM
Every time I see these yutzes, I want to run up to them and yell, "YES! You did it! Because you went naked in public ALL the puppies in the world were SAVED! You can go home now." Plus I take a couple of pictures for, y'know, documentation purposes.
Posted by: padraig the cheesehead | March 25, 2011 at 10:54 AM
for some reason, any cause that causes attractive women to get nakkid in public seems like a good cause. By the way, naked means no clothes. nakkid means no clothes on and up to something.
Posted by: oldfatguy | March 25, 2011 at 11:32 AM
naked -vs- nakkid ... got it!
Posted by: Kibby F5™ | March 25, 2011 at 12:08 PM
OFG- so what's the definition for "nekkid?"
Posted by: frodolives | March 25, 2011 at 12:13 PM
What's the definition for the work "knoiw" found in the Blog headline?
Posted by: Runner | March 25, 2011 at 12:18 PM
word...not work...(geez, smarmy comments can be difficult)
Posted by: Runner | March 25, 2011 at 12:19 PM
fro, nekkid is the proper pronunciation here in the South. My fingers typed the northern version when I was not looking.
Posted by: oldfatguy | March 25, 2011 at 12:52 PM
Nekkid Yankees WBAGNFARB
Posted by: Mazar Larry | March 25, 2011 at 01:07 PM
Judging from the misspellings in the headline, I suspect Mr. Blog may have been a tad distracted...
Posted by: wiredog | March 25, 2011 at 01:21 PM
I'm thinking this guy has the grounds for a winnable lawsuit. The accident CLEARLY was not his fault. If they had lowered their shower curtain just a foot or so he wouldn't have been leaning over so far to get a better view.
Posted by: Wingnut | March 25, 2011 at 01:26 PM
I feel for that driver - I tried to upload the images and my computer crashed.
(And as is my custom, I will be eating more meat today - you know, just so the nekkid gals will keep on protesting. Win-win.)
Posted by: MartiniShark | March 25, 2011 at 01:28 PM
Why do these nekkid PETA women never come to where I am at the moment?
If they did, I'd buy them lunch. Maybe a hamburger.
Posted by: Steve | March 25, 2011 at 08:26 PM
I contributed my part on World Water Day.
Posted by: Loudmouth | March 25, 2011 at 10:12 PM
Cameras for US news channel CBS captured the moment when the driver ploughed his car into the back of a white pick-up truck.
Neither vehicle appeared to be badly damaged....
I think they have a different definition of "ploughed" than I do. That looked like "tapped", "bumped" or "nudged". "Ploughed" (or, as we spell it here in the U.S.A. "plowed") would involve significant damage.
Posted by: ScottMGS | March 25, 2011 at 11:15 PM