THE SQUIRRELS PUT HIM UP TO IT
"It was simply a nut-free zone."
(Thanks to Mark Schlesinger)
« Previous | Main | Next »
"It was simply a nut-free zone."
(Thanks to Mark Schlesinger)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
And now that he's been fired it is officially a "nut free zone" for the first time since his employment.
Posted by: Margaritaville | January 22, 2009 at 04:31 PM
Well, maybe it was "nut" free after they fired that Macadamia.
Posted by: Diva | January 22, 2009 at 04:36 PM
Marg, I swear your comment wasn't there when I posted!
Posted by: Diva | January 22, 2009 at 04:36 PM
He denied being in possession of any nuts that day.
Sorry, Siouxie - he's married.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | January 22, 2009 at 04:39 PM
*snork* Annie - my thought EXACTLY !
Posted by: Telecomdropout | January 22, 2009 at 04:52 PM
we tried to make our office a nut -free zone, but the nuts keep coming to the office.
Posted by: queensbee | January 22, 2009 at 05:07 PM
Guess Oprah's boyfriend can get a job at this place.
Posted by: MartiniShark | January 22, 2009 at 05:15 PM
.
Technically, peanuts are not nuts. They are legumes. So, this guy was not lying. They didn't ask him if he had been in possession of legumes. Nor do the company's posted regulations prohibit legumes in the workplace. In any case, such a regulation would violate the accused's Second Amendment right to bear legumes, ipso facto, a priori and so there. Move to dismiss. With prejudice. Or without. We could go either way. Anyway, it's lunchtime. Move to the cafeteria.
No peanuts here. Move along, move along.
.
Posted by: cosanostradamus | January 22, 2009 at 07:10 PM
Does Barbara Boxer lose it if you feed a polar bear a peanut ?
Posted by: Clankazoid | January 22, 2009 at 08:29 PM
cosanostradamus, very true. he was completely legit. we will be seeing it in another of those wacky supreme court cases any day now. won't surprise me.
Posted by: Tiffany | January 24, 2009 at 04:50 PM