THERE ARE LITERALLY MILLIONS OF LEGITIMATE EXPLANATIONS
Lingerie-clad man in Beaverton woman's closet claims misunderstanding
(Thanks to Danny)
« Previous | Main | Next »
Lingerie-clad man in Beaverton woman's closet claims misunderstanding
(Thanks to Danny)
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Yeah, I'd believe the drug addled mind of a guy who wandered into a random woman's apartment and hid in her closet wearing women's undies. Only in the communist republic of Oregon. Morons.
Posted by: Doc Rick | April 09, 2008 at 07:23 AM
He was wearing a lacy negligee with fishnet stockings open at the crotch, a woman's miniskirt, sheer white blouse and long, brown wig.
What about the shoes??
Posted by: Siouxie | April 09, 2008 at 07:30 AM
Every woman's worst nightmare?
Maybe, unless they were playing Donald Trump & Paris Hilton?
What was she wearing?
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | April 09, 2008 at 07:38 AM
"But what she thought at that moment was that she was going to be raped.
"It is every woman's greatest nightmare."
Something tells me that a lingerie-clad man will most likely not be a rapist.
Posted by: Zoinks | April 09, 2008 at 07:47 AM
EVERYONE knows that when you're cross-dressing in your unknown friend's closet, you NEVER leave your meth pipe behind! How gauche! The fishnets were a nice touch tho...
Posted by: eilbeback | April 09, 2008 at 07:51 AM
I'm glad they decided to be clear and identify it as "a woman's" miniskirt, and saved me the trouble of asking.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | April 09, 2008 at 08:01 AM
Come on, it happens to everyone at least once a . . . how did she know there was no crotch in . . . he was wearing a skirt. Are we missing a few details other than he got off? Sorry, was let off by the jury? Was it a hung jury? Should they have been hung? Short skirt... he must have been hung. Or it was a really short skirt.
Posted by: JEC666 | April 09, 2008 at 08:06 AM
Mind boggled again. Thanks a lot, Dave . . .
Posted by: Mahatma Kane Jeeves | April 09, 2008 at 08:25 AM
He was found not guilty by a jury of his peers?
Sid Caesar recounted an incident in the live broadcast of "Your Show of Shows" when a courtroom scene where incredibly darning information was being presented about a defendant.
The juror's one line in the whole live performance being broadcast across the country was supposed to be "We, the jury, find the defendant guilty." Like many of us who don't always preview our comments before we post the actor accidently inserted a critical "not" into his delivery.
Live television. Critical error. Sid Caesar kept his role as defense attorney but exploded with "Weren't you listening?" and recounted the highlights as only he could. After a frenetic 30 second performance, he straightened his papers and sat down -- the original ending to the performance as planned.
As a performance, the not guilty verdict on "Your Show of Shows" was one of the classic moments of live television. As a jury decision, releasing a meth addict seems to be one of the classic moments that prove the adage "jurors are idiots."
Posted by: Not My Usual Alias | April 09, 2008 at 08:48 AM
"For a second, time stood still."
So, how did they know it was a second, then?
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | April 09, 2008 at 09:16 AM
"It is every woman's greatest nightmare."
Unless, of course, the man in lingerie in her closet is Daniel Craig. I know some women that have that dream regularly. And now a bunch of Blogettes are gonna have it tonight.
Posted by: padraig | April 09, 2008 at 09:48 AM
Maybe he can be the next winner in the "misunderstood" lottery.
Posted by: Not my usual alias | April 09, 2008 at 10:19 AM
I'm surprised he didn't try to claim he was wearing a kilt, and not a minidress. And that the fishnet stockings were part of his clan's uniform for warfare.
Posted by: Braniff77 | April 09, 2008 at 10:41 AM
THERE ARE LITERALLY MILLIONS OF LEGITIMATE EXPLANATIONS
For example, the cross dressing party was in apartment 321, not 123. Happens to me all the time.
Posted by: Merri Lee | April 09, 2008 at 12:16 PM