PEOPLE OF MASSACHUSETTS:
Get ready to spit and blaspheme freely.
(Thanks to Sue Stewart)
« Previous | Main | Next »
Get ready to spit and blaspheme freely.
(Thanks to Sue Stewart)
Posted by Dave on March 05, 2008 at 09:24 AM | Permalink
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
. . . .
The bill also would eliminate laws declaring the Communist Party a subversive organization, making adultery a criminal offense punishable by three years in jail or a $500 fine, and barring anyone from "acting in a suspicious manner around any steamboat landing, railroad depot, or any electric railway station."
. . . .
So, are the laws being updated for a future visit from Fidel now that he has a lot more time on his hands?
Posted by: Not My Usual Alias | March 05, 2008 at 09:28 AM
Well NMUA, if Fidel wants to suspiciously have an adulterous relationship at a steamboat landing or railroad depot, then he's good to go.
Posted by: jugheaded | March 05, 2008 at 09:33 AM
Jugheaded --
Fidel should probably wait until after Lent, though.
Posted by: Not My Usual Alias | March 05, 2008 at 09:35 AM
Spit happens.
Posted by: SW | March 05, 2008 at 09:36 AM
Good point NMUA.
snork@SW
Posted by: jugheaded | March 05, 2008 at 09:43 AM
Spitting? Tats? Baseball season is finally here.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | March 05, 2008 at 09:48 AM
You know, this could give rise to a whole new form of tourism in Massachusetts.
Posted by: padraig | March 05, 2008 at 09:56 AM
Would tattooing while committing adultery be considered "tit for tat"?
*Snork* @ SW
Posted by: delegate ellie | March 05, 2008 at 10:04 AM
Finally, a state where I can just be sweet, little old me.
Posted by: Texgal | March 05, 2008 at 10:04 AM
As long as it's done in sidewalk spit.
Posted by: Texgal | March 05, 2008 at 10:06 AM
Stevie...stevie...stevie... LOL
Posted by: Siouxie | March 05, 2008 at 10:09 AM
Dave's been busy this morning. More posts than I can handle at this time. But I'm sure they're all as interesting and as topical as this one. :)
Posted by: Eleanor | March 05, 2008 at 10:11 AM
The bill also would eliminate laws ..... barring anyone from "acting in a suspicious manner around any steamboat landing, railroad depot, or any electric railway station.
Phew...
Posted by: chuck | March 05, 2008 at 10:14 AM
ellie - LOL! You're always in great form, Toots. ;-)
*marks "contumeliously" as today's secret word*
Posted by: DeskDiva | March 05, 2008 at 10:16 AM
lol ellie and you fart whilst getting the tattoo...it's "toot for tat"
Posted by: Siouxie | March 05, 2008 at 10:20 AM
Ditto on the ell-oh-ellie. Did Kate Beckinsale come by for a "tat for t**t?"
Posted by: SW | March 05, 2008 at 10:25 AM
Would tattooing while committing adultery be considered "tit for tat"?
------
Dunno, but having your tattoo removed while doing it would be making a clean breast of things, wouldn't it?
Posted by: SW | March 05, 2008 at 10:32 AM
Chuck...That was certainly my reaction!
I'll meet you on the landing at the usual time...
Posted by: Betsy | March 05, 2008 at 10:32 AM
snorks @ ellie, sw & siouxie
Tat's all folks!
Posted by: daisymae | March 05, 2008 at 10:34 AM
*applauds SW's fine work*
Posted by: DeskDiva | March 05, 2008 at 10:36 AM
Brittany getting even: Twit for tat
Porn star tat: Tat for tart
Posted by: daisymae | March 05, 2008 at 10:37 AM
Does anyone know where I could find a link or a page reference to Dave's column on Schick & Gillette and how they're always trying to one-up each other by adding another blade? I want to quote that column for a marketing assignment I'm writing, and I know I have that column somewhere on my bookshelf, but I don't know which book and page.
Posted by: Bumble | March 05, 2008 at 10:42 AM
LOL daisy. How easily we are amused, eh??
*paging the s.b.*
*paging the s.b.*
Posted by: Siouxie | March 05, 2008 at 10:46 AM
Aha! Never mind. :-)
Posted by: Bumble | March 05, 2008 at 10:47 AM
um..nevermind, judi LOL
Posted by: Siouxie | March 05, 2008 at 10:48 AM
What Ted needs is a country for his state. hawkaput-ta.
Posted by: lil rascal | March 05, 2008 at 10:55 AM
Unlike Florida, I'm pretty sure we can't have our way with goats here in MA yet, so we're hanging onto civility by a thread.
Posted by: ubetcha | March 05, 2008 at 11:41 AM
ub, only with a consenting goat.
Posted by: Siouxie | March 05, 2008 at 11:48 AM
ubetcha - it's not THIS thread!
Posted by: DeskDiva | March 05, 2008 at 11:54 AM
Today's somewhat legal tip - ubetcha, next time, let the goat lead. Then you won't be accused of having your way.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | March 05, 2008 at 11:57 AM
When I visited Boston U, they said there were no sorority houses on campus because according to state law, six or more unrelated women living under the same roof constituted a brothel. I wonder if that will get repealed.
Posted by: Merri Lee | March 05, 2008 at 12:02 PM
Aye, long these many years me mateys have waited to befoul God and commit adultery in public purview.
OHHHHH, we'll spit on our tats
And loiter like rats
But nary a jailbird time
We'll tattto each other
Blasphere to our mother
But nary a fix or a fine
We'll marry queer mateys
That live out of stateys
But nary a jailbird time
Posted by: cj | March 05, 2008 at 12:04 PM
Another CJ???
LOL good one!
Posted by: Siouxie | March 05, 2008 at 12:06 PM
oooooooooooooooooo, cj, you silver tongued devil!
Posted by: Texgal | March 05, 2008 at 12:10 PM
Excellent poetry, cj! :)
Posted by: DeskDiva | March 05, 2008 at 12:11 PM
Hi, Bumble! Long time, no see:) I think of that column everytime I see yet another Technological Breakthrough -- we're up to, what, five blades now?
Posted by: Betsy | March 05, 2008 at 12:50 PM
Siouxie - by consenting, do you mean like this?
Posted by: ubetcha | March 05, 2008 at 12:59 PM
LOL ub, you and Annie think alike!
Posted by: Siouxie | March 05, 2008 at 01:03 PM
Okay, but just as long as there will be room in the handbasket . . .
Posted by: Mahatma Kane Jeeves | March 05, 2008 at 01:35 PM
Yikes! It took me so long to figure out how to post it, I didn't realize Annie already had.
Posted by: ubetcha | March 05, 2008 at 01:38 PM
ub, at least you did it! YAY for you!
(besides, having a great mind like Annie is not too shabby) ;-)
Posted by: Siouxie | March 05, 2008 at 02:02 PM
hey - lets get blaspheming out there!
Posted by: queensbee | March 05, 2008 at 02:17 PM
Very true Siouxie!
Posted by: ubetcha | March 05, 2008 at 02:18 PM
MKJ -- that is just so wrong on so many levels! Nice to know that people still know how to show proper respect and get a "great deal" at the same time.
Posted by: Texgal | March 05, 2008 at 02:32 PM
Texgal: I'll scooch over to make room in the handbasket . . .
:-P
Posted by: Mahatma Kane Jeeves | March 05, 2008 at 02:35 PM
12 bidders and counting . . .
Posted by: Mahatma Kane Jeeves | March 05, 2008 at 02:39 PM
Frickin' unbelievable for tacky plastic.
Posted by: Texgal | March 05, 2008 at 02:49 PM
MKJ, you're gonna need a bigger handbasket...just sayin'
Posted by: Siouxie | March 05, 2008 at 02:51 PM
yaabut where is it going?
Posted by: Mahatma Kane Jeeves | March 05, 2008 at 02:53 PM
High bidder: I_see_toast
Posted by: Mahatma Kane Jeeves | March 05, 2008 at 02:56 PM
"acting in a suspicious manner around any steamboat landing"
Just realized as I'm getting ready to head over to the landing, that I have no idea as to what constitutes suspicious behavior on a steamboat landing. For that matter I have no idea as to what constitutes normal behavior for a steamboat landing.
any ideas/suggestions?
Posted by: chuck | March 05, 2008 at 03:54 PM
Ask Siouxie. She seems to know about abnormal behaviour.
Posted by: jugheaded | March 05, 2008 at 04:28 PM
*raises brow* @ jug
Posted by: Siouxie | March 05, 2008 at 05:13 PM
snork. Gotcha Siouxie
Posted by: jugheaded | March 05, 2008 at 05:57 PM
juggie sweetiecakes, why is there a machete wrapped around your neck?
*silently vows to tread lightly around the Sioux and to carry a big frickin' shield*
Posted by: Texgal | March 05, 2008 at 07:18 PM
SNOOOOORK at the goat photos!
Posted by: Renee (the First) | March 05, 2008 at 07:20 PM
I actually live just outside of Boston. I have traveled on subways in Boston. I have traversed their sidewalks. I have listened to the locals. Trust me, repealing those laws is a vast mistake.
Posted by: Christine | March 06, 2008 at 03:46 AM