PAMELA ANDERSON PROBABLY HAS A PhD
(Thanks to DavCat)
« Previous | Main | Next »
(Thanks to DavCat)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
*makes it as far a "girl on girl" bra. loses ability to read.*
Posted by: fivver | December 22, 2007 at 08:49 AM
"Dance of the seven thongs"? Har!
Posted by: Suzy Q | December 22, 2007 at 09:00 AM
*throws bucket of ice water on fivver to cool him off*
Posted by: Siouxie | December 22, 2007 at 09:08 AM
Tttthhhhaaaannnkkss Siouxie. I needed that.
Posted by: fivver | December 22, 2007 at 09:15 AM
This is a branch of trickle down economics, isn't it.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | December 22, 2007 at 09:17 AM
snorrrk@Meanie
Once I got to 'dance of the seven thongs' I couldn't stop reading.
Posted by: daisymae | December 22, 2007 at 09:33 AM
I'm all for women being empowered financially, but this is ridiculous.
Posted by: daisymae | December 22, 2007 at 09:34 AM
Insightful article. I especially liked the comparison to peanut Kit K@ts.
Hand Bra WBAGNF something, but not as good as Girl on Girl Bra, a great name for ... 'scuse me, I need a cold shower.
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | December 22, 2007 at 09:50 AM
Aaarrrggghhh, seeing the subjects and I'm not able to get the link.
Posted by: JEC666 | December 22, 2007 at 10:55 AM
me neither; it says the site is currently unavailable. :(
Posted by: judi | December 22, 2007 at 11:04 AM
JEC & Judi, the site is working now.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | December 22, 2007 at 12:00 PM
You don't even want to know about the Coochienomics! Unless you're fivver. Or any other guy.
Posted by: nonanonymous | December 22, 2007 at 04:07 PM
You don't even want to know about the Coochienomics! Unless you're fivver. Or any other guy.
Posted by: nonanonymous | December 22, 2007 at 04:08 PM
Apparently the bot wants to hear about it twice.
Posted by: nonanonymous | December 22, 2007 at 04:09 PM
Somebody has spent WAAAAAAAYYYY too much time thinking about this.
/Then again, most guys think about this ALL the time, so maybe not.
Posted by: Moon | December 22, 2007 at 06:03 PM
Yeah, exactly Moon. I thought that article was fairly brief considering.
Posted by: nonanonymous | December 22, 2007 at 06:27 PM
Yeah, ok, the analysis of model fees sounds spot on, although I suspect the drop-off in fees happens rather more slowly than that. But what exactly was her point?
Posted by: Richard the Weasel-Hearted | December 22, 2007 at 09:20 PM