ATTENTION TAXPAYERS, ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO TRAVEL BY AIR:
Want to avoid stress? Then do not click on this.
« Previous | Main | Next »
Want to avoid stress? Then do not click on this.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
&*!!!%%$***!
That is all.
Posted by: AuntieM | November 21, 2007 at 10:16 AM
It's smart for Congress to do this when their apprival rating can't get any lower.
Posted by: SW | November 21, 2007 at 10:16 AM
I do not apprive either
:-P
Posted by: Mahatma Kane Jeeves | November 21, 2007 at 10:20 AM
What AM said. Only maybe a couple more $$** and even !@#.
Posted by: gjd | November 21, 2007 at 10:20 AM
Wasteful spending? By Congress?
C'mon, who they tryin' to kid?
Posted by: Howard from Broward | November 21, 2007 at 10:22 AM
It's too early in the day for a really good rant.
*sets alarm for 2:00*
*prepares soapbox*
Posted by: The Dread Pirate Chris | November 21, 2007 at 10:22 AM
This idea will never fly in Sanduskey.
Posted by: JEC666 | November 21, 2007 at 10:23 AM
For Mahatma.
Posted by: SW | November 21, 2007 at 10:24 AM
I think a one-quart, resealable, clear plastic bag over the heads of the referenced Congressional delegations would be a prudent security measure. If one-quart bags are too small, the heads will need adjustment.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | November 21, 2007 at 10:26 AM
I can't even get a first class seat to where I need to fly at Christmas because it's not one of those destinations with my favored airline...@#$%##%# Congresspeople!!!!
Posted by: Kathybear | November 21, 2007 at 10:31 AM
Meanie, Congressional Shrunken Heads WBAGNF the legislative branch.
Posted by: Just Ducky | November 21, 2007 at 10:36 AM
Having been a senior federal worker, I can tell you the Congressmen will make fact finding trips to places like the Napa Valley (is drought affecting the wine crop?); the Alps over XMAS (is global warming affecting the ski slopes, er, snow mass?), etc.
Darfur? Bangladesh? Not so much.
Oh, they'll go to Iraq or Afghanistan if they're running for President or have a tough race in 2008.
Posted by: PeterM | November 21, 2007 at 10:39 AM
ps to Dave: If Al Franken can do it, so can you. Run for Senator from Florida. Really.
Posted by: PeterM | November 21, 2007 at 10:40 AM
I, personally, would consider this money well spent if the plane were equipped with either a trap door or ejector seats, which would activate when the plane was at 30,000 feet over the ocean.
Posted by: Just Ducky | November 21, 2007 at 10:42 AM
SW: Thinks!
Posted by: Mahatma Kane Jeeves | November 21, 2007 at 10:42 AM
As Peter's dad said in Independence Day, "You did't really think they spent $80,000 for a toilet seat, did you? Or $40,000 for a wrench?"
Posted by: daisymae | November 21, 2007 at 11:18 AM
Speaking of air travel ..... hope this isn't too late.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | November 21, 2007 at 11:33 AM
I guess I don't completely understand the outrage.
Yeah, it's expensive and classy but according to this story,
You can't conduct classified in-flight government business from the middle seat of Row 34, not matter how much it may gratify the hoi polloi.Our government officials do need to travel, sometimes en masse and this would seem to be a reasonable way to cart them about.
Posted by: Steve | November 21, 2007 at 11:42 AM
Steve. there seems to be some concern of the possibility of this privilege being abuses. A lot.
Posted by: gjd | November 21, 2007 at 12:28 PM
Steve, clearly congress needs private air travel, but do they need new custom built airplanes?
Posted by: Edgar Greenberg | November 21, 2007 at 12:29 PM
“Travel like the Pros”
NEVER PAY FULL PRICE AGAIN
TRAVEL WHOLESALE
WITH THE COMFORT OF BOOKING ALL YOUR TRAVEL NEEDS ONLINE AT COMPETITIVE PRICES
Log On To: WWW.USEEKTRAVEL.COM
Or call (917) 544-3636
FRANCHISE INFO AVAILABLE
Imagine becoming a Referring Travel Agent (RTA), booking your own vacations and getting paid to do it! Travel first class for pennies on the dollar. You can earn up to 60% of commissions on all travel booked through your own website!
(917) 544-3636
JOIN THE TRAVEL INDUSTRY AND ENJOY ALL THE PERKS
You will receive Travel Agent Credentials!
Websites to run your business from the comfort of your home!
Have access to Familiarization (FAM) Trips!
Significantly, discounted trips around the world!
Part of the reason for all of the excitement is the very lucrative commissions attached to both the sale of Travel AND the sale of Online Travel Agencies.
When you, your friends, family and associates book their travel through your website, you earn 60% of the vendors’ commission! You can earn a great part-time income simply by referring people to your website to book their travel.
A tremendous opportunity also exists by building your business.
If you dream of having your own travel agency Take vacation while making commission $$$...
…in cruises, hotels, airplane tickets, and car rentals!
Create an international branch in your home or office.
Posted by: useektravel | November 21, 2007 at 12:34 PM
useek, you crack me up . . . hey, waitjustadarnedmiinit . . .
Posted by: Mahatma Kane Jeeves | November 21, 2007 at 01:06 PM
How did you get past the 'type in opr9iuteop page?'
Posted by: Mahatma Kane Jeeves | November 21, 2007 at 01:07 PM
"I think a one-quart, resealable, clear plastic bag over the heads of the referenced Congressional delegations would be a prudent security measure. If one-quart bags are too small, the heads will need adjustment."
i thought meanie said putting congress-person's heads in plastic bags would be PRURIENT when i first read that which makes as much sense as a lot of things.
Posted by: mudstuffin | November 21, 2007 at 01:21 PM
Steve: Yes, members of congress sometimes need to travel for legitimate reasons, and they sometimes need to conduct business in-flight -- as do many taxpayers. Members of congress are also famous for wasting spectacular sums of money and taking ludicrously unnecessary junkets at taxpayers' expense. This is why those of us who don't have access to luxury jets free of charge, and thus are dependent on a commercial-air-travel system that is (a) managed by the federal government, and (b) getting more hideous every year, are feeling a tad cynical about this new congressional perk.
Posted by: Dave | November 21, 2007 at 02:35 PM
Ooh! Dave sounds like he's taking off the gloves and readying himself fpr his first presidential
dust-updebate!Posted by: SW | November 21, 2007 at 04:01 PM
I agree
Posted by: Siouxie | November 21, 2007 at 05:11 PM