ATTENTION, MICHIGANDERS
Make sure you stick to just the one Michigoose.¹
¹Sorry.
(Thanks to Mike McNelis - oops! - and Andy the tropichunt.com guy)
« Previous | Main | Next »
January 19, 2007
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Download your 'Fins iPhone application
First.
Posted by: Edgar Greenberg | January 19, 2007 at 02:39 PM
Course the law doesn't affect me in any way.
Posted by: Edgar Greenberg | January 19, 2007 at 02:39 PM
Somebody fire judi for that pun. (JUST KIDDING, of course!!!!)
Posted by: Clean Hands | January 19, 2007 at 02:41 PM
We're gonna need a bigger jail.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | January 19, 2007 at 02:42 PM
LOL judi!!
I can see it now...they'll use the "Clinton" excuse.
"I did not have sexual penetrations with that woman."
and YAY,Andy!!!
Posted by: Siouxie | January 19, 2007 at 02:44 PM
"The appeals court decision involved a man convicted of trading prescription painkillers for sex."
hmmm... why didn't i think of this?
(BTW judi - i liked the pun.)
Posted by: mudstuffin | January 19, 2007 at 02:45 PM
criminal sexual conduct, which occurs whenever "sexual penetration occurs under circumstances involving the commission of any other felony."
"This is a stick-up. Now give me all the money in the drawer. Now let me bang you. Not in a rape kind of way; in a two mutually consenting adults kind of way."
Posted by: The Dread Pirate Chris | January 19, 2007 at 02:46 PM
DPC, arson would be even funnier.
Posted by: Edgar Greenberg | January 19, 2007 at 02:48 PM
Banging a burning bush, Edgar?
Posted by: Clean Hands | January 19, 2007 at 02:51 PM
The answer of course is not to be screwing whilst you're knocking off the liquor store.
Posted by: Mot the Hoople | January 19, 2007 at 02:52 PM
Should read. *hangs head in shame* The answer of course is not to be screwing somebody else's wife whilst you're knocking off the liquor store.
Posted by: Mot the Hoople | January 19, 2007 at 02:53 PM
No Mot. It only specifies penetration during the commission of a crime. It does not actually say who is getting penetrated. (Or, I suppose, what is getting penetrated.)
Posted by: The Dread Pirate Chris | January 19, 2007 at 02:55 PM
"Any time a person engages in sexual penetration in an adulterous relationship, he or she is guilty of CSC I."
So as long as they don't get into toys and such, only the male could be found guilty of the the crime?
It doesn't seem quite fair...
Posted by: Hammond Rye | January 19, 2007 at 02:56 PM
As HR starts to point out...they really aren't specific about what is doing the penetrating (and to whom the penetration occurs)...
Posted by: tropichunt.com guy™ | January 19, 2007 at 03:05 PM
Imagine that! Judges being instructed to follow the legislation, no matter how ridiculous, and force the Legislature to correct the flaws. Why that's.... downright Constitutional!
Posted by: CJrun | January 19, 2007 at 03:09 PM
Next up: "Marriage rate in Michigan plummets."
(Although they did leave a lot of leeway with that definition.)
Posted by: Lisa Bisa Fo Fisa | January 19, 2007 at 03:10 PM
*waves to CJ from Firefox*
Posted by: Lisa Bisa Fo Fisa | January 19, 2007 at 03:10 PM
*snork* @ judi's pun
and Yay! to Tropic for getting posted.
Posted by: Lisa Bisa Fo Fisa | January 19, 2007 at 03:12 PM
LBFF: Thanks. :)
Siouxie, too!
*thinks of new way to get his a** back up on the blog*
Posted by: tropichunt.com guy™ | January 19, 2007 at 03:17 PM
tropichunt - reminds me of the old limerick that ends
"They argued all night
over who had the right
to do what and with which and to whom"
Posted by: mm | January 19, 2007 at 03:49 PM
1st 2 lines
"Once a gay man from Khartoum
took a wh0re up to his room"
Posted by: mm | January 19, 2007 at 03:51 PM
I've been to Khartoum and you wouldn't go within 10 ft. of a ho there.
Posted by: Mot the Hoople | January 19, 2007 at 03:56 PM
*snork* @ Mot
Posted by: mm | January 19, 2007 at 04:03 PM
Hey, what's with this sudden dual credit thing with Mike? I share my credits with no one!*
* (unless Dave and judi deem it is necessary)
8)
Posted by: tropichunt.com guy™ | January 19, 2007 at 04:11 PM