ATTENTION, MICHIGANDERS

Make sure you stick to just the one Michigoose.¹

¹Sorry.

(Thanks to Mike McNelis - oops! - and Andy the tropichunt.com guy)

Comments

[Edgar Greenberg]

First.

[Edgar Greenberg]

Course the law doesn't affect me in any way.

[Clean Hands]

Somebody fire judi for that pun. (JUST KIDDING, of course!!!!)

[Meanie the Blue]

We're gonna need a bigger jail.

[Siouxie]

LOL judi!!

I can see it now...they'll use the "Clinton" excuse.

"I did not have sexual penetrations with that woman."

and YAY,Andy!!!

[mudstuffin]

"The appeals court decision involved a man convicted of trading prescription painkillers for sex."

hmmm... why didn't i think of this?

(BTW judi - i liked the pun.)

[The Dread Pirate Chris]

criminal sexual conduct, which occurs whenever "sexual penetration occurs under circumstances involving the commission of any other felony."

"This is a stick-up. Now give me all the money in the drawer. Now let me bang you. Not in a rape kind of way; in a two mutually consenting adults kind of way."

[Edgar Greenberg]

DPC, arson would be even funnier.

[Clean Hands]

Banging a burning bush, Edgar?

[Mot the Hoople]

The answer of course is not to be screwing whilst you're knocking off the liquor store.

[Mot the Hoople]

Should read. *hangs head in shame* The answer of course is not to be screwing somebody else's wife whilst you're knocking off the liquor store.

[The Dread Pirate Chris]

No Mot. It only specifies penetration during the commission of a crime. It does not actually say who is getting penetrated. (Or, I suppose, what is getting penetrated.)

[Hammond Rye]

"Any time a person engages in sexual penetration in an adulterous relationship, he or she is guilty of CSC I."

So as long as they don't get into toys and such, only the male could be found guilty of the the crime?

It doesn't seem quite fair...

[tropichunt.com guy™]

As HR starts to point out...they really aren't specific about what is doing the penetrating (and to whom the penetration occurs)...

[CJrun]

Imagine that! Judges being instructed to follow the legislation, no matter how ridiculous, and force the Legislature to correct the flaws. Why that's.... downright Constitutional!

[Lisa Bisa Fo Fisa]

Next up: "Marriage rate in Michigan plummets."

(Although they did leave a lot of leeway with that definition.)

[Lisa Bisa Fo Fisa]

*waves to CJ from Firefox*

[Lisa Bisa Fo Fisa]

*snork* @ judi's pun

and Yay! to Tropic for getting posted.

[tropichunt.com guy™]

LBFF: Thanks. :)

Siouxie, too!

*thinks of new way to get his a** back up on the blog*

[mm]

tropichunt - reminds me of the old limerick that ends
"They argued all night
over who had the right
to do what and with which and to whom"

[mm]

1st 2 lines

"Once a gay man from Khartoum
took a wh0re up to his room"

[Mot the Hoople]

I've been to Khartoum and you wouldn't go within 10 ft. of a ho there.

[mm]

*snork* @ Mot

[tropichunt.com guy™]

Hey, what's with this sudden dual credit thing with Mike? I share my credits with no one!*

* (unless Dave and judi deem it is necessary)

8)