LEGAL ARGUMENT OF THE WEEK SO FAR
(Thanks to Kaf Aleni)
« Previous | Main | Next »
(Thanks to Kaf Aleni)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
the future of bank robbers, in league with lawyers.
Posted by: crossgirl | December 18, 2006 at 08:42 AM
I think this guy sold me my last used car.
Posted by: Layzeeboy | December 18, 2006 at 08:54 AM
Ah, another day of combatting malicious comment posting by scripts.
*puts on cyber-superhero costume*
Posted by: Layzeeboy | December 18, 2006 at 08:56 AM
He "acted honorably"? Sounds more like he was trying to drum up business.
Posted by: ScooterRocky | December 18, 2006 at 09:09 AM
Does the term "ambulance chaser" have a New Zealand equivalent?
Or is it "extortionist" I'm thinking of?
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | December 18, 2006 at 09:23 AM
Layzee...nice tights!
Posted by: Siouxie | December 18, 2006 at 10:05 AM
I hereby officially propose a new word to the lexicon of business: "chutzpreneur".
Thank you.
Posted by: Betsy | December 18, 2006 at 10:05 AM
kudos, Kaf! (since when was your name two parts?)
*snork* @ Betsy
Posted by: MOTW | December 18, 2006 at 10:32 AM
Thanks, Siouxie. I didn't think I could pull off wearing pink ones but they seem to work.
Posted by: Layzeeboy | December 18, 2006 at 11:34 AM
MOTW - email problems.. so I'm using gmail at the moment. It wanted a first and last name, so I split my blog name in two.
Jeff.. it's still ambulance chaser - the vowel sounds are just a little more flat.
Posted by: Kafaleni | December 18, 2006 at 11:40 AM
"Invalid Story" The link didn't work for me.
Posted by: Sean | December 18, 2006 at 11:40 AM
Invalid story it is. I guess it's a story about a person recuperating in a hospital.
Posted by: Stevie W | December 18, 2006 at 12:03 PM
The article was on a guy who admitted to hacking into a NZ bank and then sued the bank for his 'service' because he pointed out security flaws that they then patched.
Posted by: MOTW | December 18, 2006 at 12:14 PM
"Invalid story" sounds like a plea bargain, to moi ownself ... merely sayin' ...
Posted by: OtheU(manity) | December 18, 2006 at 12:46 PM
Here's the story:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/dominionpost/3902965a6000.html
Posted by: Matt Thorn | December 18, 2006 at 07:12 PM