MEANWHILE, ON THE BRASSIERE FRONT
...we have these developments.
« Previous | Main | Next »
...we have these developments.
Posted by Dave on October 20, 2006 at 09:19 AM | Permalink
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Davis sucks out the fat with a metal cannula, as thin as a straw.
FIRST to say...SLURRRRRRRRP!
Posted by: Siouxie | October 20, 2006 at 09:22 AM
As to the suctionage, losing weight has gotta be cheaper.
Posted by: ubetcha | October 20, 2006 at 09:23 AM
Well, I guess littering makes sense. She left idiots strewn all over the highway...
Mark.
Posted by: markhh | October 20, 2006 at 09:26 AM
Sounds like something out of a Julia Childs TV show.." I now I suck the fat out with this metal thing..What't it called? A cannula..Here we go (suuurrppp)... Isn't that lovely"..
Posted by: Sean | October 20, 2006 at 09:28 AM
In the first story link, the pursuing men weren't trying to avoid the mystery object. The men were trying to catch it.
Posted by: Heinrich the Rat | October 20, 2006 at 09:28 AM
which way do ya want the ramparts, fellas. i bet you dont care if they are fat ones or small ones or ...... ramparts is ramparts.
Posted by: queensbee | October 20, 2006 at 09:31 AM
my answer to the bra-fat problem is my usual...
LETS BURN THOSE BRAS!!!
Posted by: Siouxie | October 20, 2006 at 09:31 AM
"The bra, which reportedly had been frayed because it was chewed by Miss Davis' dog earlier in the day, flew off the antenna. "
'kay.
Posted by: Cat R. | October 20, 2006 at 09:35 AM
Maybe I'm talking crazy talk here, but is it too much to suggest actually... erm.... losing the weight?
Posted by: Brian | October 20, 2006 at 09:42 AM
yes brian, it is.
Posted by: crossgirl | October 20, 2006 at 09:43 AM
Brian, actually losing the weight takes up too much effort & time when you can just SUCK it up!
Posted by: Siouxie | October 20, 2006 at 09:45 AM
Wasn't Brastrap Fats a famous pool player?
Posted by: russell | October 20, 2006 at 09:48 AM
I have a feeling these threads are gonna get interesting today. Much fodder for
dementedpervertedinquiring minds.Posted by: blurk | October 20, 2006 at 09:49 AM
Mmmmmmmmmm.............underarm cleavage.....
Posted by: Punkin Poo | October 20, 2006 at 09:49 AM
I believe we used to call them Back Boobs. Which were usually caused (not aleviated) by sucking it up.
Posted by: The Dread Pirate Chris | October 20, 2006 at 09:54 AM
*just glad she's got front boobs*
Posted by: Siouxie | October 20, 2006 at 10:04 AM
I find this story about back boobs to be patently offensive. While I do encourage open and honest dialogue about fatties and their back fat, I'm afraid this blog has not been designated a "Free Speach Zone." I'm going to kindly ask that this thread be removed.
Posted by: Brian | October 20, 2006 at 10:06 AM
Speach. Is that like more than one peach only with the S in the front and no e? English majors, little help here.
Posted by: blurk | October 20, 2006 at 10:09 AM
actually, brastrap fats was a chicago blues man.
Posted by: crossgirl | October 20, 2006 at 10:12 AM
Massage is the answer. (I don't care what the question is.)
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | October 20, 2006 at 10:13 AM
It says if they gain weight that brastrap fat will come back. I wonder what would happen if they lose weight? I mean, in the first place. It would be a lot cheaper.
Posted by: Beppie | October 20, 2006 at 10:15 AM
good answer meanie!
Posted by: crossgirl | October 20, 2006 at 10:19 AM
Crossgirl, I think you're right. Brastrap Fats was the harmonica player for Muddy Milkers, wasn't he?
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | October 20, 2006 at 10:20 AM
What is left on Inspector Clousseau's answering machine, Meanie??
Posted by: Siouxie | October 20, 2006 at 10:22 AM
Sacré bleu! Why, that would be a massage, Mme. Siouxie.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | October 20, 2006 at 10:29 AM
*figures that was le question*
Posted by: Siouxie | October 20, 2006 at 10:31 AM
now see? i happen to think there's a national epidemic of "bra fat" -- so sucking it out seems like a good idea. far better than having all those fat-backed women dispense with their bras all together, which would be floppy *and* flabby. not to mention scary.
Posted by: puppytoes | October 20, 2006 at 11:45 AM
Brian, I have another solution for you... If you've (a woman, not you Brian) got back boobs going, maybe DON'T WEAR A TIGHT SHIRT!! Sorry for shouting but Jesus's face on a bagel, some people (again, not you Brian) are stupid!
Posted by: Brad | October 20, 2006 at 01:39 PM
The real reason I don't wear a bra. (At least when I'm working at home and not in the office.) :)Or you could just get a bra that fits correctly. Much cheaper then the sucking thing.
Posted by: kittypaws | October 20, 2006 at 02:07 PM
Getting a proper fit can be a pretty big challenge, especially for someone underendowed but wearing a few extra pounds in general.
Posted by: Clean Hands | October 20, 2006 at 02:24 PM
"Back fat will come back if you put on weight."
Maybe that's why they call it back fat.
Posted by: CandyT | October 20, 2006 at 03:17 PM
Okay, many svelte women have bra fat issues. This is an area that's really darn hard to target for exercise. And to the people who said to get a proper fitting bra--you fit for what goes in the bra, not what the bra goes around; that's the only way to get enough support. But Brad definitely has the best idea. It's not that big a deal to get a bigger shirt, plus you'll be able to breathe more easily.
Posted by: MareBear | October 20, 2006 at 03:42 PM
Hey, if there is one thing Brad knows his way around, it's a brassiere.
Posted by: Brad | October 20, 2006 at 10:39 PM