MEANWHILE, ON THE BRASSIERE FRONT
...we have these developments.
« Previous | Main | Next »
October 20, 2006
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Davis sucks out the fat with a metal cannula, as thin as a straw.
FIRST to say...SLURRRRRRRRP!
Posted by: Siouxie | October 20, 2006 at 09:22 AM
As to the suctionage, losing weight has gotta be cheaper.
Posted by: ubetcha | October 20, 2006 at 09:23 AM
Well, I guess littering makes sense. She left idiots strewn all over the highway...
Mark.
Posted by: markhh | October 20, 2006 at 09:26 AM
Sounds like something out of a Julia Childs TV show.." I now I suck the fat out with this metal thing..What't it called? A cannula..Here we go (suuurrppp)... Isn't that lovely"..
Posted by: Sean | October 20, 2006 at 09:28 AM
In the first story link, the pursuing men weren't trying to avoid the mystery object. The men were trying to catch it.
Posted by: Heinrich the Rat | October 20, 2006 at 09:28 AM
which way do ya want the ramparts, fellas. i bet you dont care if they are fat ones or small ones or ...... ramparts is ramparts.
Posted by: queensbee | October 20, 2006 at 09:31 AM
my answer to the bra-fat problem is my usual...
LETS BURN THOSE BRAS!!!
Posted by: Siouxie | October 20, 2006 at 09:31 AM
"The bra, which reportedly had been frayed because it was chewed by Miss Davis' dog earlier in the day, flew off the antenna. "
'kay.
Posted by: Cat R. | October 20, 2006 at 09:35 AM
Maybe I'm talking crazy talk here, but is it too much to suggest actually... erm.... losing the weight?
Posted by: Brian | October 20, 2006 at 09:42 AM
yes brian, it is.
Posted by: crossgirl | October 20, 2006 at 09:43 AM
Brian, actually losing the weight takes up too much effort & time when you can just SUCK it up!
Posted by: Siouxie | October 20, 2006 at 09:45 AM
Wasn't Brastrap Fats a famous pool player?
Posted by: russell | October 20, 2006 at 09:48 AM
I have a feeling these threads are gonna get interesting today. Much fodder for
dementedpervertedinquiring minds.Posted by: blurk | October 20, 2006 at 09:49 AM
Mmmmmmmmmm.............underarm cleavage.....
Posted by: Punkin Poo | October 20, 2006 at 09:49 AM
I believe we used to call them Back Boobs. Which were usually caused (not aleviated) by sucking it up.
Posted by: The Dread Pirate Chris | October 20, 2006 at 09:54 AM
*just glad she's got front boobs*
Posted by: Siouxie | October 20, 2006 at 10:04 AM
I find this story about back boobs to be patently offensive. While I do encourage open and honest dialogue about fatties and their back fat, I'm afraid this blog has not been designated a "Free Speach Zone." I'm going to kindly ask that this thread be removed.
Posted by: Brian | October 20, 2006 at 10:06 AM
Speach. Is that like more than one peach only with the S in the front and no e? English majors, little help here.
Posted by: blurk | October 20, 2006 at 10:09 AM
actually, brastrap fats was a chicago blues man.
Posted by: crossgirl | October 20, 2006 at 10:12 AM
Massage is the answer. (I don't care what the question is.)
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | October 20, 2006 at 10:13 AM
It says if they gain weight that brastrap fat will come back. I wonder what would happen if they lose weight? I mean, in the first place. It would be a lot cheaper.
Posted by: Beppie | October 20, 2006 at 10:15 AM
good answer meanie!
Posted by: crossgirl | October 20, 2006 at 10:19 AM
Crossgirl, I think you're right. Brastrap Fats was the harmonica player for Muddy Milkers, wasn't he?
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | October 20, 2006 at 10:20 AM
What is left on Inspector Clousseau's answering machine, Meanie??
Posted by: Siouxie | October 20, 2006 at 10:22 AM
Sacré bleu! Why, that would be a massage, Mme. Siouxie.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | October 20, 2006 at 10:29 AM
*figures that was le question*
Posted by: Siouxie | October 20, 2006 at 10:31 AM
now see? i happen to think there's a national epidemic of "bra fat" -- so sucking it out seems like a good idea. far better than having all those fat-backed women dispense with their bras all together, which would be floppy *and* flabby. not to mention scary.
Posted by: puppytoes | October 20, 2006 at 11:45 AM
Brian, I have another solution for you... If you've (a woman, not you Brian) got back boobs going, maybe DON'T WEAR A TIGHT SHIRT!! Sorry for shouting but Jesus's face on a bagel, some people (again, not you Brian) are stupid!
Posted by: Brad | October 20, 2006 at 01:39 PM
The real reason I don't wear a bra. (At least when I'm working at home and not in the office.) :)Or you could just get a bra that fits correctly. Much cheaper then the sucking thing.
Posted by: kittypaws | October 20, 2006 at 02:07 PM
Getting a proper fit can be a pretty big challenge, especially for someone underendowed but wearing a few extra pounds in general.
Posted by: Clean Hands | October 20, 2006 at 02:24 PM
"Back fat will come back if you put on weight."
Maybe that's why they call it back fat.
Posted by: CandyT | October 20, 2006 at 03:17 PM
Okay, many svelte women have bra fat issues. This is an area that's really darn hard to target for exercise. And to the people who said to get a proper fitting bra--you fit for what goes in the bra, not what the bra goes around; that's the only way to get enough support. But Brad definitely has the best idea. It's not that big a deal to get a bigger shirt, plus you'll be able to breathe more easily.
Posted by: MareBear | October 20, 2006 at 03:42 PM
Hey, if there is one thing Brad knows his way around, it's a brassiere.
Posted by: Brad | October 20, 2006 at 10:39 PM