« Previous | Main | Next »
August 17, 2006
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Download your 'Fins iPhone application
FIRST boogers!!
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:14 PM
And SECOND, let me note that
Utahansfolks from the great state of Utah are really strange.Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:17 PM
What? Why is this story odd?
Posted by: Jazzzz | August 17, 2006 at 05:19 PM
gerbils??? Is Richard Gere from Utah??
just askin'
Posted by: Siouxie | August 17, 2006 at 05:22 PM
Well, I found a new toy because of that article.
Posted by: Bismuth | August 17, 2006 at 05:23 PM
Did they collect data to see how many of those searches resulted in submissions to the Dave Barry blog?
And Somewhere in Time is not sappy!
Posted by: Lisa Bisa Fo Fisa | August 17, 2006 at 05:23 PM
What would be fun would be to see what the readers of a certain blog are searching for.
Then again, amybe we really don't want to know.
Never mind.
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:24 PM
http://www.google.com/trends?q=dave+barry&ctab=0&geo=US&date=all is interesting
Posted by: Sarah J | August 17, 2006 at 05:25 PM
Sorry LBFF, though I liked it, too, Somewhere in Time is very high in sap content.
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:25 PM
argh!
this is interesting. Maybe strumpeting in SLC would be worthwhile?
Posted by: Sarah J | August 17, 2006 at 05:26 PM
"Mormons in Utah very likely search out information about Jesus,"
hmm sure...sheep, panties, nude dancing..all very popular back in Sodom & Gomorra...
Posted by: Siouxie | August 17, 2006 at 05:27 PM
How to Utahites have time to google with all that polygamy going on?
Posted by: Punkin Poo | August 17, 2006 at 05:27 PM
Sheep AND Boogers???
Posted by: russell | August 17, 2006 at 05:27 PM
Well, Siouxie, if you're doing a thorough job of your Bible study...
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:28 PM
so what was the word they originally used before the correction?
Posted by: Betsi | August 17, 2006 at 05:28 PM
It's the correction, not the story, that's noteworthy. But that's not only all by itself in a very Dave sort of way. It's totally intriguing to me in my own weird way:
What, I demand to know, did this correction correct?
I see the defective phrase in the text, but it's already corrected. What could they (the author, not the Utahns) have been thinking? How do we find out what they originally reported? Was the original error so much more embarrassing than the correction itself that they not only had to print the word "boogers" but also obliterate any trace of the error? Can one hack their site to view the prior version? Or do I have to find an out-of-town-papers newsstand, and pay them $6.50 to get a hard copy? - which is easy enough in my city but maybe not at 6pm.
Where are the Utahn bloglits? What did Dave know, and when did he know it? Have we ways to make him talk? My kingdom* for the original word!
[*Disclosure: I am not in fact a real king]
Posted by: Avon | August 17, 2006 at 05:28 PM
Speaking of polygamy, Punkin, nice triple. :-D
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:29 PM
It was good for me....
Posted by: russell | August 17, 2006 at 05:30 PM
Oh, Eleanor, shame, shame!
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | August 17, 2006 at 05:30 PM
Oh, my! And a nice one for me, as well. ;-)
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:30 PM
Whew! Getting worn out here, Russell. :o)
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:31 PM
Hmmm...guesses to original word:
burgers
beggars
bloggers
bouquet
boola
bigger
bagger
...nah, Boogers is just better!
Posted by: Guin | August 17, 2006 at 05:32 PM
Avon - it's 'snot' standard to reprint the error, just the correction.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | August 17, 2006 at 05:32 PM
Austin is KING! (I'm so proud of my state cap..)
booger
Posted by: russell | August 17, 2006 at 05:32 PM
maybe the original word was cock soup?? *shrugs*
Posted by: Siouxie | August 17, 2006 at 05:33 PM
russell, CH...now Guin? Quit googling my trends, people - I'm gettin' worn out here!
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | August 17, 2006 at 05:33 PM
whoa...Cincinnati just took over 1st place!
Posted by: russell | August 17, 2006 at 05:33 PM
CH-Well OK, it's sappy. But they didn't have to say that, like, out loud.
Posted by: Lisa Bisa Fo Fisa | August 17, 2006 at 05:34 PM
We who live in Utah prefer to be called Utahns or Utards vs Utahites, in case you were wondering (except for me, I'm a Californian, I just live in Utah at the moment, my license plates are CA, and so is my driver's license and voter registration. YAY! for CA!!)
Posted by: Sarah J | August 17, 2006 at 05:34 PM
Hey, Russell, ya gotta pace yourself. Three in a row is enough to wear out even a strong man.
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:35 PM
Thanks for the clarification, Sarah. And thanks for noticing my confusion.
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:35 PM
Wow, this thing is sensitive. I did a trendcast on Twitney - LA was 4th. I go back and check again - we're all the way down to 8th. Somebody crank up the T-1 line - we will NOT be stuck behind Cincinnati!
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | August 17, 2006 at 05:36 PM
>leaves the blog to go take a nap<
:)
Posted by: russell | August 17, 2006 at 05:36 PM
Why is it that ever since I called out the spammer on another thread, just about every one of my posts has been challenged by the robot?
Just askin'...
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:37 PM
another simul with russell! zzzzz....
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | August 17, 2006 at 05:37 PM
they'd rather be called Utards than Utahites? That's..um...Utarded...
maybe they wrote "bogeys"? "Boogeyman"?
Posted by: Betsi | August 17, 2006 at 05:37 PM
This is an interesting statistic
Posted by: Gypsysoul66 | August 17, 2006 at 05:37 PM
Okay, ladies, not all at once! There's enough to go around... ;-)
VERY interesting stat, Gypsy.
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:39 PM
Mostly they call themselves Utahrds, maybe not so nice to call them that if you're not one of them (at least to their face) I tend to call drivers on I-15 between Provo and SLC Utahrds a lot
Posted by: Sarah J | August 17, 2006 at 05:39 PM
CH, what you complainin' about?!
Posted by: Betsi | August 17, 2006 at 05:40 PM
go git 'em, Betsi.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | August 17, 2006 at 05:41 PM
*pouts* I thought simuls w/multiple bloggettes was a "good" thing for men of the male persuasion.
Posted by: Gypsysoul66 | August 17, 2006 at 05:42 PM
Uh, not complaining, Betsi... just a little overwhelming when y'all come at me at once.
Prefer to give personalized attention, when possible. But I understand that it's not always possible.
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:43 PM
Gypsy, there's just no pleasing 'em.
Posted by: Betsi | August 17, 2006 at 05:44 PM
Okay, okay! Pile on! Sheesh! :-D
I'll survive.
Somehow.
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:44 PM
sheesh - men. There's no figurin' 'em out.
Posted by: Gypsysoul66 | August 17, 2006 at 05:45 PM
that's better...ya happy now?
Posted by: Betsi | August 17, 2006 at 05:45 PM
*jumps in*
Posted by: Siouxie | August 17, 2006 at 05:46 PM
Delirious.. and tired. :-P
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:46 PM
and misses!!!
Posted by: Siouxie | August 17, 2006 at 05:46 PM
lol @ Siouxie
Posted by: Betsi | August 17, 2006 at 05:47 PM
mebbe not *grin*
there's that contotionist trick again!!! top AND bottom!
Posted by: Siouxie | August 17, 2006 at 05:47 PM
DANG ROBOT ><
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:47 PM
But did you see, according to this article, what St. Louis is #2 in? We may need to move.
Posted by: mary the blog kids mom | August 17, 2006 at 05:47 PM
contoRtionist, geez
Posted by: Siouxie | August 17, 2006 at 05:47 PM
AND middle, just for good measure.
Thorough.
I like that about you, Siouxie.
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:48 PM
A five-way. I don't know quite what to make of that.
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:49 PM
wb Siouxie
Posted by: Gypsysoul66 | August 17, 2006 at 05:49 PM
yeah...I'm flexible that way...
Posted by: Siouxie | August 17, 2006 at 05:49 PM
I guess!
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:50 PM
thanks Gypsy...for the simul too :)
Posted by: Siouxie | August 17, 2006 at 05:50 PM
What has this city of only 100,000 or so been eating?
Posted by: Matt | August 17, 2006 at 05:52 PM
How 'bout this?
Posted by: ScottMGS | August 17, 2006 at 05:53 PM
*snork* @ Matt. Good one.
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:54 PM
one could ask the same about the Big Apple: http://www.google.com/trends?q=cannibalism&ctab=0&geo=US&date=all
Posted by: Betsi | August 17, 2006 at 05:54 PM
sorry, I am too lazy to use HTML.
Posted by: Betsi | August 17, 2006 at 05:54 PM
Link for Betsi.
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:55 PM
Russell,
Austin may be first in "booger", but Salt Lake City is still first in "boogers" as the article claimed. What's the deal, you Texans only have one nostril? Or are Utahns just snottier?
Annie,
It may not be standard to print a correction that includes a re-statement of the error (though "the newspaper of record" does make its corrections clear, when necessary, by explaining how the new version is different, which is sometimes almost indetectable). But I didn't know that papers normally sanitize the original version in addition to printing a correction! Are you sure? What's the use of that ... if there's no error anymore then any correction is redundant and/or too late. (The "Grey Lady" keeps all the news that's fit to print, warts and all, and just appends the corrections to the piece containing the error, along with a heads-up at the top mentioning that a correction follows. That makes sense.)
Posted by: Avon | August 17, 2006 at 05:55 PM
ty CH.
Posted by: Betsi | August 17, 2006 at 05:56 PM
the Grey Lady? thats a nickname right?
Posted by: Betsi | August 17, 2006 at 05:57 PM
Hey, AnnieWBH, it wasn't me and I seriously doubt it was Eleanor but we're (not were) stuck here with the Britney Googling Lot! (WNBAGNFARB)
Posted by: ScottMGS | August 17, 2006 at 05:57 PM
Why, Betsi! A three-way with just you? That's... intriguing. ;-)
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:57 PM
my pleasure
no, really :-)
Posted by: Gypsysoul66 | August 17, 2006 at 05:57 PM
who would have thought i was so talented...
Posted by: Betsi | August 17, 2006 at 05:58 PM
Whee! Finally got my sammich!
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:58 PM
stoopid robot
Posted by: Gypsysoul66 | August 17, 2006 at 05:58 PM
Utahrds are awfull drivers. No really they are. And they steal fish -Catch and RElease area, guess what part they did- And Jello is awfull.
Though I wish to point out that the Bible Belt seems to look up panties. While Jesus only shows up in One Bible Belt State. Makes an odd comment about our reality.
Though if you want really odd
Guess where I live!
Posted by: Alfred | August 17, 2006 at 05:59 PM
Miami is number 1 and Tampa is number 2. Doesn't Florida have waxing salons?
Posted by: Matt | August 17, 2006 at 05:59 PM
TWO sammiches!
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 05:59 PM
but is glad it enabled CH to obtain the much sought after sammich
Posted by: Gypsysoul66 | August 17, 2006 at 05:59 PM
the Jello in Utah is worse than elsewhere?
Posted by: Betsi | August 17, 2006 at 06:00 PM
and one Brokeback moment :P
Posted by: Siouxie | August 17, 2006 at 06:00 PM
Oh - a simul w/2 male bloggers...mmm
Posted by: Gypsysoul66 | August 17, 2006 at 06:00 PM
...followed by a brokeback three-way. NTTAWWT... for someone else. *sigh*
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 06:00 PM
gotta make it fair boys :-P
Posted by: Gypsysoul66 | August 17, 2006 at 06:01 PM
and a psychic mind meld with me....
Posted by: Siouxie | August 17, 2006 at 06:01 PM
ooo - a 4-way
Posted by: Gypsysoul66 | August 17, 2006 at 06:02 PM
*Perks up again*
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 06:02 PM
giant squid and stuff
Posted by: Lisa Bisa Fo Fisa | August 17, 2006 at 06:02 PM
Challenged by the robot three times. Crimus.
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 06:02 PM
I'm gonna need to leave the office for a moment to have a smoke and collect myself
*fans herself ala Scarlett O'Hara*
Posted by: Gypsysoul66 | August 17, 2006 at 06:03 PM
smokin'
Posted by: Siouxie | August 17, 2006 at 06:03 PM
I can't explain the giant squid stat, LBFF.
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 06:04 PM
Problem is, I'm weak in the knees :-)
Posted by: Gypsysoul66 | August 17, 2006 at 06:04 PM
Lime Jello with Shredded Carrots.
Posted by: Alfred | August 17, 2006 at 06:04 PM
worn out here too, Gypsy!
Posted by: Siouxie | August 17, 2006 at 06:05 PM
Oh Clean, we have to stop - I'm goose-pimply
Posted by: Gypsysoul66 | August 17, 2006 at 06:05 PM
How's that again, Alfred? Thanks, I'll try the café cubano first.
Posted by: Clean Hands | August 17, 2006 at 06:05 PM
Siouxie - I can see I'm gonna need to start on my multi-vitamins again if I'm to remain a healthy bloggette
Posted by: Gypsysoul66 | August 17, 2006 at 06:06 PM
NOW the server's workin!
Posted by: Siouxie | August 17, 2006 at 06:06 PM