« Previous | Main | Next »

July 26, 2006

NEW BRITISH LAW

It's hot, but you're not.

(Thanks to Ken Pendergraft)

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I vote to ban speedos...some men are just not meant to wear 'em...PERIOD!

I think this should be at the viewer's discretion. For example: Kiefer, Matthew McConaughy, Mario Lopez - OFF baby. Jim Belushi, that guy from King of Queens - ON plus a layer.

24 - I'm with ya!

Would one of you British-type bloglits (or anyone else that knows) please splain what a "trainer" is?

Yeah, this same publication also put on their front page a close-up shot of Scarlett Johansson's *gasp* cellulite. Phhffft!

- Lunch Alert -
Whatever you do, do NOT click on the link "Gallery: the proof that men should NEVER go topless". Really.

You'll thank me for this warning.

blurk: trainers are tennies, running shoes, or whatever you call it where you're from.

blurk - maybe a wife-beater???

nevermind :) judi knows!

dear god - that pic with the thong! good thing I haven't eaten yet (and yes I was curious ...*smacks head*)

OMG OMG OMG - I looked at the thong...help me....

Any law that saves me from having to look at "hairy ape backs" & "man boobs" is A-OK with me!!! Here in Satan's Training Camp (Florida) if I can not take my shirt off in public to cool off (& I look a hell of a lot better than most of the men out there!) then why should men be allowed to? Double standards & discrimination.

Trainers is British for Nikes. Also, a jumper is what we call a sweater.

As far as viewer discresion I completely agree with 24. And as far as that gallery goes, pic number 7 made me want to simultaneously burst out into laughter and vomit. WHO LET HIM BUY THAT!?!? Arrests should be made!

Thanks, judi and Guin. Now I don't feel so stupid. Well, I do...but now I know what trainers are.

THAT should come with a disclaimer...and eye bleach

Okay, I'm totally deranged - I wanted to see a front shot of the thong guy. ....looking up number of shrink......

Sorry MOTW, I couldn't resist. Disturbing, but worth the laugh regardless.

Now wait, I think #6 is wearing a leather jacket.

No...

Sorry, that was skin.

I vote for stapling a tarp to the guy in the thong.

"But one of the things that is depressing for anyone going shopping is the numbers of shaven-headed men, mainly in their 30s and 40s, who seem to think people want to see their torsos."

What does "shaven-headed" have to do with anything???

Yeah, this same publication also put on their front page a close-up shot of Scarlett Johansson's *gasp* cellulite......


you mean her lips?

In the USofA you have the right to bear arms; in Ontario Canada you have the right to bare breasts.

So this law is only gonna address MEN going bare chested. It's OK for women?

I'll be back in a little while. Gonna switch over to Priceline and book a flight to London.

blurkernomore

Hold off on that ticket until the adopt catherine's equal-rights suggestion - something that I'm in favor of, btw.

If I don't have to wear a shirt than neither should she!

(Ignoring the fact that I'd be wearing a shirt anyway - I sunburn easily and I like pockets)

wish they'd pass the same law in arizona, where we don't even consider temps in the 90's for several consecutive months to be a heat wave.

I totally agree: if I can't go topless when it's hot out, then men shouldn't either. If they want to bare it all, then I should be able to, too. I'm content with whichever way they want to legislate, as long as things are equal across the board. Though my bazoomage cannot even begin to compare with Punkin's. I'd be far less distracting.

The comments to this entry are closed.

-
 
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Copyright | About The Miami Herald | Advertise