« Previous | Main | Next »
April 17, 2006
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

SECOND!
Posted by: JT | April 17, 2006 at 01:30 PM
Crud!!!!!
Posted by: JT | April 17, 2006 at 01:31 PM
Could I have a price check please?
Posted by: jp | April 17, 2006 at 01:31 PM
Yup - that would certainly be exactly the perfect multi functional gift for every dad!
Posted by: CoastRaven | April 17, 2006 at 01:32 PM
Well, with my Yugo trade-in, I should be able to get a pretty sweet discount...
Posted by: JT | April 17, 2006 at 01:33 PM
Warning - if you are not hot looking, you WILL look ridiculous driving this car. And the salesman WON'T mention that.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 17, 2006 at 01:34 PM
So Dave would be OK in it,right Annie? :)
Posted by: Eleanor | April 17, 2006 at 01:35 PM
Man oh man, I bet that if Dave decided to get one, he'd have to write a new column once a week for three weeks...
Posted by: JT | April 17, 2006 at 01:37 PM
If you can afford thus car, you won't care if you look ridiculous.
Posted by: Texas | April 17, 2006 at 01:38 PM
jp - As JR Ewing once said - If you have to ask, you can't afford it.
Posted by: CoastRaven | April 17, 2006 at 01:39 PM
El - absolutely, Dave would look terrific in this, although the blue shirt may have to go. ;)
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 17, 2006 at 01:40 PM
Will they take my Daewoo as a trade-in? That ought to knock off about half the price, I'm thinking....
Posted by: clark kent | April 17, 2006 at 01:42 PM
the only guy who could afford it is this guy
and the 3 g's of braking force would cause him to strangle on his own jowlfat!
Posted by: insomniac | April 17, 2006 at 01:43 PM
insom. From the good ole' state of Texas.
Posted by: Texas | April 17, 2006 at 01:47 PM
Really, you'd look ridiculous driving that car unless you're already a superhero.
Posted by: reneviht | April 17, 2006 at 01:54 PM
Did I mention that I just put a new pine tree air freshener in it AND cleaned the ashtray? Let the haggling begin....
Posted by: clark kent | April 17, 2006 at 01:56 PM
Does it come with the naked blonde lying spread eagle across the hood in the rain, or is that extra?
Like floormats.
Posted by: Punkin Poo | April 17, 2006 at 01:57 PM
insom - eeeew! all that money and he doesn't get his teeth fixed? Nevermind get out of Texas.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 17, 2006 at 01:58 PM
not this dad
i was thinkin' more along the lines of this
Posted by: TC | April 17, 2006 at 01:59 PM
Tiny - at least it's a Dodge. But you'd need the extended cab for all the carseats.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 17, 2006 at 02:09 PM
mother's day is first. do they do a ball check before they sell these or something 'cause i think i'd look cute in the drivers seat.
Posted by: crossgirl | April 17, 2006 at 02:10 PM
Annie - if I had that truck, I wouldn't let my kids look at it, let alone actually ride in it
Posted by: TC | April 17, 2006 at 02:17 PM
The Caparo was such a girl-car in its day. Is Chevy actually gonna bring it back? At any rate, I'p happier with py Pustang.
Posted by: Brad | April 17, 2006 at 02:18 PM
Reminds me of the conversation I had with dear hubby this morning while walking the dog. A big dirty truck with enormous tires drove past. Hubby points it out to me. My reaction?
"I know. Looks ridiculous. I mean, why put those huge tires on that old truck?"
Then I got a LOOK that told me I was completely missing the point of the conversation.
I still say the truck looked silly.
Posted by: Somewhere North | April 17, 2006 at 02:24 PM
Thumper - the carseats are for all your little baby bunnies. *tosses a period up to Tiny's post*
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 17, 2006 at 02:26 PM
SN - you were probably supposed to admire the custom shock absorbers...but I'm glad you didn't.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 17, 2006 at 02:35 PM
Somewhere North-
My mom and I always referred to those as people who shopped at Billy Joe Bob's House of Big and Stupid Tires. Of course they occasionally had to go to his cousin Stu's House of Big and Stupid Suspensions as well.
Posted by: almne | April 17, 2006 at 02:36 PM
North. Just the difference between men and women. Different realities. It's just amazing that couples find anything in common.
Posted by: Texas | April 17, 2006 at 02:36 PM
Somewhere North - it probably did look silly - it's all a matter of how much is too much
for example, this looks silly (and not just cuz it's a ford
this, on the other hand, is cool
Posted by: TC | April 17, 2006 at 02:37 PM
Try as I might, I cannot get past, "What do you get when a world-class team develop..."
DEVELOPS!
DEEEVEEELLLLOOPPPSSSSSSSSS!
Posted by: Tamara Rhymes With Camera | April 17, 2006 at 02:38 PM
I thought mid-life crisis = ridiculous sports car. I, for one, am not going to hurry that along by purchasing the stud-mobile for him! Plus, I'm pretty sure it exceeds my $100 budget
Posted by: 24-aholic | April 17, 2006 at 02:38 PM
hey, I'm dual-hatted as both mom and dad. if I sell my kids on mother's day and invest the money wisely, I can afford to get this in....carry the 2, add 7, ... only 100 more years. darn.
Posted by: azred | April 17, 2006 at 02:40 PM
azred - bless you! You should be spoiled rotten on both Mom and Dad day!!!!
Posted by: 24-aholic | April 17, 2006 at 02:44 PM
Tamara RWC - It's just another one of those British-English oddities. When speaking of a group, the Brits tend to use the plural verb form, whereas we proper-English-speaking Americans insist that a group takes a singular verb. I guess it's because to them, a group is plural because they're referring to the individual members, while we see that "a group" is a single thing, independent of its members.
Today's Silly English lesson brought to you by me.
Posted by: Mr. Completely | April 17, 2006 at 02:56 PM
Dave, when you showed this to Mrs. Blog did she:
a) laugh
b) give you THAT LOOK
c) sigh and remind you to take out the garbage?
Pssst Annie, what's this about TC missing a period?
Posted by: fivver | April 17, 2006 at 03:12 PM
Mr. C. I assume you are sort of English or American English teacher. However, my head DID spin when I read your post.
Posted by: Texas | April 17, 2006 at 03:15 PM
Thank you, Mr C!
But it's still WRONG! ;)
Posted by: Tamara Rhymes With Camera | April 17, 2006 at 03:15 PM
Ohhhh. English fight ! English fight !
Posted by: Texas | April 17, 2006 at 03:17 PM
fivver - Thumper has a tendency to miss them. I mentioned it on another thread, and people wanted to give him a baby bunny shower for his upcoming wee ones.
p.s. - whenever this is mentioned, Thumper seems to hop away.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 17, 2006 at 03:19 PM
Texas - since you're unarmed, you'll just have to watch.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 17, 2006 at 03:20 PM
TRWC...I am absolutely on your side in this fierce battle. It delayed me by several seconds while I contemplated all the various "rules" I've encountered in my years of editing. There is a faction that believes that if a group functions "together", it takes a singular verb; but if it is characterized by internal disagreement and strife, it becomes plural. Thus, "The committee agrees that the sentence looks silly." But "the committee disagree about whether it's wrong."
Posted by: Betsy | April 17, 2006 at 03:23 PM
*zips in*
Ahhh, Annie, my favorite crabby-old-woman-with-bad-grammar from New Yawk. Hey, that WBAGNFARB.
*french-kisses annie to make up*
*throws up*
*zips out*
Posted by: Texas | April 17, 2006 at 03:23 PM
Yay!
*takes sides*
I'm with Tamara!! Go Girl!
Punkin, that's one of my pet peeves. Why, why, why, can't they throw in the damn floor mats? But they won't, no matter what you offer to do in exchange for them *sigh*.
Posted by: Eleanor | April 17, 2006 at 03:23 PM
WooHoo! Another for TRWC's side. When I saw that I had to close the window because it was bothering me so much. I wonder, does reading this blog makes these tendencies worse?
Posted by: Sarah J | April 17, 2006 at 03:40 PM
WELL!
I'll just take my Strunk & White's and go home.
Booger.
Posted by: Mr. Completely | April 17, 2006 at 03:47 PM
That thing is so very ugly. But I guess looks aren't everything. To a guy. In some cases.
Posted by: Bumble | April 17, 2006 at 03:50 PM
Just in case anybody doesn't believe that men and women are different, when I first saw this, I thought (exact words) "Stupid web site is putting an ad before I can see what to get my hubby for Dad's day!!! I wonder if it's a tool."!! It took me a couple seconds to realize he actually meant the car.
Posted by: Beth | April 17, 2006 at 03:53 PM
The he** with Daddy- I want that car!!!!
Posted by: Kathy P. | April 17, 2006 at 03:56 PM
I was actually curious enough to look through the press kits, etc. and found a blurb about the price coming in at a cool £150k.
Caparo Dealer (happily pecking away at computer): "At current exchange rates, that would be $265,391.72. A bargain at twice the price, trust me.* With floor mats? $265,466.72. And of course, you'll want the undercarriage coated. Gotta protect that investment, don't you? - which will run you another $1103.83. Then there is the delivery fee, dealer prep, stocking fee, advertising reimbursement assessment, double secret port entry tariff premium. Look, why don't you just cut me a check for $300K, and we'll call it even.
* When a car dealer says "trust me", protect your wallet immediately.
Posted by: Moe | April 17, 2006 at 03:56 PM
"
Posted by: Moe | April 17, 2006 at 03:58 PM
Mr. C., I wasn't aware that you are fluent in both Brit and Merkin. If you're also proficient with Canadian and Aussie, you have earned membership in the Wordwhipper's Club, which I am just now forming. I need an excus-- erm, a valid reason to gather with like-minded individuals for social interaction, after all. Whaddya say?
Posted by: WriterDude | April 17, 2006 at 04:00 PM
W'Dude - I am SO there!
Posted by: Mr. Completely | April 17, 2006 at 04:12 PM
WriterDude - I have a LOT to learn in matters of wordsmithing, could I join as an apprentice member? I was thinking mebbe I could help in organizing Wordwhippers as a non-profit (since all the profits from dues would go to beverages) or as a religion (since many members would be at one form of an altar or another after the meetings).
Posted by: CoastRaven | April 17, 2006 at 04:28 PM
OK, who else is game? Here's the test for membership:
1) The hood of a car is known as a ______ in England.
A. lid
B. hatch
C. bonnet
D. more famous
2) What Australians call a "barbie", Americans call:
A. a doll
B. a grill/barbecue
C. a phone sex operator
D. an incompetent teacher
Please hand your papers in at the end of class today. Once we have a few more members, we can haggle over times and places and who buys the social interaction.
Posted by: WriterDude | April 17, 2006 at 04:34 PM
CR: Excellent thinking. You're in. Maybe this can be our altar.
Posted by: WriterDude | April 17, 2006 at 04:41 PM
OK, even I know the answers to those questions, which means they are way too easy to be considered an actual test
a better test would be: "let's see who can drink at least 8 social interactions
Posted by: TC | April 17, 2006 at 04:42 PM
*looks up at the bookshelf to see Strunk & White, Chicago Manual of Style, and Lapsing Into a Comma.*
Can I sit around and soak up the atmosphere?
I can bring some of this.
Posted by: Olo Baggins of Bywater | April 17, 2006 at 04:49 PM
Well, TC (where'd your K go?), we're nothing if not inclusive. Welcome to the club.
If allowed to pace myself I'm sure I could handle eight of the first social interactions I put up, but if I attempt eight of the second sort there'd better be an ambulance on stand-by.
Posted by: WriterDude | April 17, 2006 at 04:49 PM
Olo: You're in, if only for the high quality of your social interaction. But your bookshelf qualifies on its own merit as well.
Posted by: WriterDude | April 17, 2006 at 04:54 PM
OK, I was talkin' about social interaction #2
8 of the first type wouldn't be much of a test either - more like a warm-up
OK, maybe I drink too much - either way, I'm all for social interaction
and last I heard, my K was either on El's key-chain, or southerngirl had it
Posted by: TC | April 17, 2006 at 04:56 PM
Remember the immortal words of Dorothy Parker:
"I love a martini,
But two at the most.
Three, I'm under the table.
Four, I'm under my host."
I shudder to think of what I might be under after eight -- a bus, most likely.
Posted by: WriterDude | April 17, 2006 at 05:08 PM
I'm not sure I could drink 8 martinis either - never actually tried - but I do love a challenge
Posted by: TC | April 17, 2006 at 05:18 PM
WriterDude - I believe Mr. C said he was "EFFLUENT in both Brit and Merkin," not 'fluent.'
Tiny, El sold your "K"....to KMart...it's been discounted already.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 17, 2006 at 05:52 PM
I have it! Bought it on sale. Thought it would be fun to yank Tiny's K since he's been chasing me around the blog on his back today.
Posted by: KKDF | April 17, 2006 at 06:27 PM
ah, there's my K
so, KDF, darlin' - are ya gonna wear that K on a chain around your neck, so it's near to your heart?
or will you keep it in your pocket, so it's near to your...
what?
oh yeah, family blog
well, I'm sure you know my preference
Posted by: TC | April 17, 2006 at 06:39 PM
Oh, I think you know where it will be, Tiny. Your K's been stolen, traded, sold, and bought for less than retail today.
I'm either in possession of evidence, or a future yard sale item. But I'll hang onto it for now because it's really kinda cute.
judi? want a turn with TC's K?
Posted by: KKDF | April 17, 2006 at 06:55 PM
yeah, that's what I thought
it'll be in your pocket, so as to be near your...
what!
I know, I know - family blog
Posted by: TC | April 17, 2006 at 07:07 PM
*snork*
Aren't all families dysfunctional?
Thought so.
Posted by: KKDF | April 17, 2006 at 07:13 PM
ok, I was gonna remind everyone - again - that I picked up the "K" hours ago, FIRST, and that it can't be sold, or auctioned, or anything of the kind, unless I say so.
but, after catching TC blatantly flirting with KDF, I've decided to let it go.
*goes off in search of Blue, since KDF is apparently busy chasin' off T "whatever his name is" - I forget...*
;D
Posted by: southerngirl | April 17, 2006 at 08:27 PM
oh, good job KDF!! now ya got me in trouble
no worries tho - she won't forget my name for long - not if I have anything to say about it
Posted by: TC | April 17, 2006 at 09:19 PM
Oh, don't you go blamin' it on me, skirt peeker! You're on your own, darlin'!
Posted by: KKDF | April 17, 2006 at 09:57 PM
skirt peeker?
*snork*
(oh yeah, I was gonna be indignant)
take 2:
Hey! I'm not the one that was standin' up on the soapbox, with that short skirt, and those long legs, where everyone that cared to look could see my...
what!?
oh yeah - family blog
anyway, where was I again? somethin' about legs, right?
Posted by: TC | April 17, 2006 at 10:19 PM
Mr. C, WD an' them others ...
Try as I may, I am unable to discern with any hope of reliable guesswork, what any of the three editions of Fowler's have to say about this question of usage, which you have so effectively framed into an interrogative communication.
The same can be said about looking it up in my copy of the AP Stylebook.
Mostly, 'cuz they're all on my bookshelf at home, next to the desktop PC ... all of which are about 498 miles away from Sue Trips and Falls, Sodak ...
Irregardless (!) of that fact, or of those facts, I'd be sorta interested in watchin' y'all discuss these questions, and any others that might arise or develop ... I'd prolly best just sign up with "audit" status tho, with werk intrudin' into my blog time -- sometimes as often as every day ... merely sayin' ...
Posted by: O. the U(manity) | April 17, 2006 at 11:37 PM
Annie - I never said any such thing - W'Dude said it!!!
Sheesh.
And why do "effluent" and "affluent" mean things so completely different?
Just askin'....
Posted by: Mr. Completely | April 17, 2006 at 11:49 PM
Mr. C et al.: I've always gotten a kick out of those British plural-isms when they apply to rock bands (ex.: "Yes are performing tonight" or "Genesis are Phil Collins, Tony Banks and Michael Rutherford).
And for my fellow musicians out there: the Brits refer to a sixty-fourth note as a "hemidemisemiquaver"--IANMTU. They also call a quarter note a "crotchet."
Posted by: Kev | April 18, 2006 at 12:07 AM
TC - shouldn't you be looking for your "K" instead of "T" & "A"?
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 18, 2006 at 03:41 AM
Kev - Yes, indeed.
Posted by: Mr. Completely | April 18, 2006 at 10:10 AM
Crossgirl: They don't do a ball check but your weenie has to be less than 2 inches to be interested in this car. (Psych 101).
Mr. Completely: I believe it's called a collective noun which takes the third-person singular form of the verb. (English 101)
Does that qualify me for the social interaction? (Shaken not stirred).
Posted by: Layzeeboy | April 18, 2006 at 01:32 PM