CAN YOU HEAR FEEL ME NOW?
(Thanks to Michael)
« Previous | Main | Next »
(Thanks to Michael)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD.
Posted by: Sarcasmo | April 17, 2006 at 05:59 PM
That's:
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD.
For those with skinny blogs. NTTAWWT
Posted by: Sarcasmo | April 17, 2006 at 06:00 PM
I, too, am "blown away."
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 17, 2006 at 06:00 PM
oooh, simul with Sarc....
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 17, 2006 at 06:01 PM
"People who use it are just blown away," said Steve Rhodes
Do what now?
Posted by: Sarcasmo | April 17, 2006 at 06:01 PM
And a simulthought as well. Did we just experience some teledildonics of our own?
Posted by: Sarcasmo | April 17, 2006 at 06:02 PM
Here's why this is a bad Idea
It may take a minute or two to load, but it's worth it.
Posted by: Sarcasmo | April 17, 2006 at 06:09 PM
Sarc - was it gooooooooood for you, too?
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 17, 2006 at 06:11 PM
Well, not quite as good as it could've been, I had my Probulator plugged in to the wrong port, but still, it could've been much worse.
Posted by: Sarcasmo | April 17, 2006 at 06:16 PM
Really? I hadn't noticed.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 17, 2006 at 06:18 PM
I give it til, say, tomorrow before the On-line Career Academy offers its first Certificate Program in the Growing Field of Teledildonics.
Posted by: Betsy | April 17, 2006 at 06:34 PM
What if say, the neighbor's garage door opener in on the same frequency?
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 17, 2006 at 06:38 PM
shoot, Annie...ain't nothin' wrong with a little frequency:)
Posted by: Betsy | April 17, 2006 at 06:40 PM
"IS" on the same frequency...I was typing and my er, pager went off again so I messed uuuuuup...
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 17, 2006 at 06:45 PM
Did anyone else but me notice that the word dildo is in the middle of the long scientific word?
And Sarc, I'm still waiting for it to load, whatever IT is...
Posted by: Eleanor | April 17, 2006 at 07:32 PM
So its not just me! A section of the web seems to be down. Can't get into CNN or hotmail. Most other things seem to work. Maybe too many people tried to log into this sex article and overheated a server.
Posted by: ArcticAl | April 17, 2006 at 07:36 PM
OK Big deal, its Barbarella come to reality.
Posted by: CoastRaven | April 17, 2006 at 07:38 PM
I'm guess I'm still stuck in the dark ages. I confess (you know you did too) to clicking on the link to realdoll.com. That is just...beyond words.
I honestly had no idea such things existed...
Posted by: Jacki | April 17, 2006 at 07:52 PM
this STILL doesn't solve the problem of not having a partner now, though, does it? seriously, does it? i'm not sure i understood the specifics but i gather two persons are still involved albeit remotely so WHAT GOOD IS IT!?!? ahem. don't mind me. move along. nothing to see here.
Posted by: crossgirl | April 17, 2006 at 08:01 PM
crossgirl - guys will pay phone-s@x people - who will 'buzz' them for a nominal fee.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 17, 2006 at 08:15 PM
I looked everything up - at the library :-) - and it's pretty , um , weird looking.... $139 gets you the basic male version.v I'm not sure what the male gets...NTTAWWT...Whew...I'm outta here...
Posted by: Kathy P. | April 17, 2006 at 09:23 PM
"They are doing things with monkeys." Marvin Minsky said.
(nttawwt)
Posted by: insomniac | April 17, 2006 at 11:32 PM
Teledildonics WMAGNFARB
Posted by: Layzeeboy | April 18, 2006 at 12:52 PM
http://www.flamingmailbox.com/maccomedy/movies/ibrator.html
Now just imagine a Beowulf of _these_...
Posted by: otis wildflower | April 18, 2006 at 03:17 PM
I'm all for it if it would keep the perverts away from kids... But that would be a whole different line of robotics, I suppose.
I agree with crossgirl. I prefer a real-life he-man who has a mind of his own and an aim to please.
The reason this is just wrong, as far as I am concerned, is that it feeds into the me-me-me's. The real deal happens when two people are more concerned about pleasing the other person than themselves. Takes on a life of its own, turns it into love-making instead of just sex. Not that there's anything wrong with just sex, of course, between consenting adults of whatever persuasion.
Them's my sentiments and I'm sticking to 'em. Now I will put my soap box away.
Posted by: Hanna | April 18, 2006 at 04:21 PM
Whoopee! Now we don't need real women anymore!!!
Posted by: bubba | April 18, 2006 at 08:59 PM
"said Julia Heiman, director of the Kinsey Institute"
Heiman...heh, heh.
Posted by: deaner | April 18, 2006 at 10:42 PM