HEADLINE OF THE DAY
We have no idea what it means, but we kind of want to go there.
(Thanks to Justin Barber)
« Previous | Main | Next »
We have no idea what it means, but we kind of want to go there.
(Thanks to Justin Barber)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
You sure about that?
Posted by: Mahatma Kane Jeeves | March 29, 2006 at 05:48 PM
“There’s lot of reading and a lot of homework,”
YEAH HOMEWORK!!!!
Posted by: CoastRaven | March 29, 2006 at 05:50 PM
OK, was anyone else disappointed after reading the article? the place sounded way more interesting from the headline
Posted by: TCK | March 29, 2006 at 05:54 PM
What kind of talent spotting???
I guess pulling all-nighters kind of goes with that activity.
Posted by: killjoy | March 29, 2006 at 06:03 PM
I guess we're making fun of the approriate use of the word "cum" here? Isn't that tantamount to forcing someone to resign for using the word "niggardly"?
Posted by: «LabSpecimen» | March 29, 2006 at 06:04 PM
Yeah, my customers are like sponges too.....
Posted by: MoFaux | March 29, 2006 at 06:09 PM
oh i dunno, lab. i kinda thought adding "talent spotting venue" made it more amusing.
YMMV, of course.
Posted by: judi | March 29, 2006 at 06:15 PM
Lab's right, but that's why we're here.
Posted by: pogo | March 29, 2006 at 06:21 PM
like an "American Idol" for biz folk ....sure....maybe some of the Hooter 'talent' that are getting 'laid off' could attend....
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | March 29, 2006 at 06:23 PM
So if I'm talent-less, does that mean if I went there I'd just be cum spotting?
There, maybe that'll make Lab happy instead...
Posted by: Higgy | March 29, 2006 at 06:25 PM
no, judi, no! we do *not* want to go there! all this talk of "talent" and "cum" and "exposure to business leaders"??? one word, judi, my friend... ewwwwwwww.
Posted by: puppytoes | March 29, 2006 at 06:32 PM
Italicized, it would probably pass muster in the body of the article, but not in a headline. For every ten people who read down to paragraph three there are a hundred who skim the headlines looking for trigger words: tragedy, torture, murder, catastrophe, Britney, bombs, prostitution, six-legged lambs, etc. Their little auto-sensors must have gone off the charts when they saw 'cum'.
My vote: bad editorial choice.
Posted by: Betsy | March 29, 2006 at 06:38 PM
Pray one doesn't graduate Summa Cum Laude
Posted by: pogo | March 29, 2006 at 06:40 PM
The article fails to mention the three levels based on proficiency: X, XX and XXX. ANd it is not to be confused with the cheap imitation NC-17 camps.
Posted by: KOW | March 29, 2006 at 06:43 PM
Should have been about the world's oldest profession.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | March 29, 2006 at 06:44 PM
So apparently I wasn't the only one disappointed to find the headline was supported by the text of the article...*snif*
Posted by: artist formerly known as "tsktsk" | March 29, 2006 at 06:50 PM
err...that would be "was NOT supported"....
Damned robot...
Posted by: artist formerly known as "tsktsk" | March 29, 2006 at 06:52 PM
GE? Gratuitous Erotica? Going Erogenous? Great Exercize? Getting Ewwwwwwwwed?
Posted by: Graz | March 29, 2006 at 07:14 PM
How nice that they have their lovely outing at Croton, which overlooks the Hudson, the river GE tried to kill with pcbs and then refused to clean up. Jack Welch, thy name is mud, and thy soul is polluted.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | March 29, 2006 at 07:23 PM
sorry, no funny on that one....I grew up in the Hudson Valley and tried to help clean up the river.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | March 29, 2006 at 07:23 PM
Just ask Mr Webster:
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/cum
Posted by: | March 29, 2006 at 07:32 PM
BTW ... sorta just a little vaguely related to the thread -- (crime in business?) --NEbuddy around here seen a lawyer-type-gender person lately? I know there's two or six of y'all in the bloglit bunch ...
I'd be interested in discussions of surreptitious intrusion if'n y'all wanna talk about it ... (that's a Class A Misdemeanor, in Nodak -- reason I know is 'cuz MB(RH?) just finished jury duty on a trial with 12 counts of it against the defendant ... perty much somewhut interestin' ... merely sayin' ...)
Posted by: O. the U(manity) | March 29, 2006 at 08:05 PM
I graduated from Law School magna cum laude. Does that make me a bad person?
Should I burn my diploma?
It was a dum headline. Get it?
Posted by: Eleanor | March 29, 2006 at 08:43 PM
TWENTY-FOURTH!!!!!!!!!
(Again.)
Posted by: JT | March 29, 2006 at 09:17 PM
The camp sucks, but it is one of the destinations of Hooters Air.
Posted by: The Sarcasticynic | March 29, 2006 at 09:44 PM
Somehow this headline reminds me of the "punctuation lady" who wrote the book 'Eats Shoots and Leaves.' Or was it 'Eats, Shoots, and Leaves.'? Or maybe it was Eats, Shoots and Leaves.' Something like that. I think any comma in that headline anywhere actually makes it even sexier. Even if you're not a Panda.
Posted by: moray | March 29, 2006 at 10:01 PM
My dad used to say I graduated 'magna cum lousy.'
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | March 29, 2006 at 11:13 PM
"It’s like graduate school on steroids,”... no steroids man, it'll kill your cum talent
Posted by: tipper | March 30, 2006 at 12:06 AM
*wants to say something about magna cum & loudly but finds it a hot topic*
... Mommy? Is that how volcanios are born?
*wonders what the requirements are for the Boot Camp Training Instructors - darts?*
Posted by: kibby F5™ | March 30, 2006 at 04:24 AM
The comments are funnier than the headline.
But that's why we're here, right?
I just wanted to say niggardly.
Posted by: «LabSpecimen» | March 30, 2006 at 08:20 AM
Yes, it's a perfectly cromulent word (obscure Simpsons reference).
I think we may be looking at a culture thing here.
At most newspapers in the U.S. the writer doesn't write the headline, the copy desk does. So if this were an American publication, I'd suspect the work of some cloistered, unworldly copy desk biddy.
But this is a Brit publication and maybe they don't use the word the way it has unfortunately come (cum?) to be used on this side of the pond. So it may have been read by thousands (millions?) of FT readers without even a snicker.
Posted by: Bill | March 30, 2006 at 12:57 PM
...we kind of want to go there..
*snork!*
Posted by: Leetie | March 30, 2006 at 04:53 PM
GE, Pleaseeeeee! Corporate America caring for employees to move up.
Posted by: REY | March 30, 2006 at 11:35 PM