ART APPRECIATION 101
Today's topic: The Art of Montana.
(Thanks to Drew Harchick)
« Previous | Main | Next »
January 18, 2006
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
All I have to say is, "Swallow"
*snork
Posted by: anita | January 18, 2006 at 06:19 PM
I didn't see a "woodpecker" figurine in there. I guess he only works in ceramics.
Posted by: Lairbo | January 18, 2006 at 06:21 PM
I didn't see any Ostriches sticking there heads in a hole...
Posted by: gjcjax | January 18, 2006 at 06:23 PM
"Wubber dickey, you're the one!"
Posted by: Brainy Jello | January 18, 2006 at 06:26 PM
But seriously, that Dean Adams has some issues.
Posted by: Brainy Jello | January 18, 2006 at 06:28 PM
...and no chickens...choking.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | January 18, 2006 at 06:30 PM
Also, I'm glad we don't make fun of people's names around here anymore, or I'd have to link to this guy.
Posted by: Brainy Jello | January 18, 2006 at 06:31 PM
“I likened the emergence of Light to a manifestation of two brothers, knowing quite well that there are not two brothers, nor even one. But I saw that one is the embodiment of the desire to be, to express, and one (not saying ‘the other’) is to be, to be. The latter is non-luminous, and the former, prevailing, is luminous. This prevailing luminous source can be visualized as becoming a wild dance of flame that settles and spends itself into material. Material, I believe is spent Light.”
This is the Artist's bio. HUH? Biography = information that is written about someone. A nonsensical quotation is NOT a bio. What this tells me about the artist is that he was smoking something stronger than a cigar, but we knew taht from the samples of his work.
Posted by: Jessica R. | January 18, 2006 at 06:39 PM
So they're ceramic birds ... in the shape of penises. Am I missing something here? No? OK, that's just odd. Like ceramic birds aren't tacky enough.
Posted by: magic8ball | January 18, 2006 at 06:40 PM
'Click on images to enlarge'
*SNORK*
Posted by: KOW | January 18, 2006 at 07:23 PM
KOW --
Oh, that it were that easy to do ...
Enlarge, with a simple click, I mean ...
Posted by: U.O | January 18, 2006 at 07:55 PM
I wonder if he makes Tits
Posted by: Fancy17 | January 18, 2006 at 08:11 PM
"No, officer; I'm an artist, and that's my model."
Posted by: Betsy | January 18, 2006 at 11:22 PM
That's "Art?" I think "Art" needs to put some clothes on.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | January 19, 2006 at 02:57 AM
Brainy Jello, it could be worse. But I'm not linkin'. That would be wrong.
Posted by: Poop Dogg | January 19, 2006 at 02:58 AM
When will he do a Balled Eagle?
Posted by: CandyT | January 19, 2006 at 03:47 PM