THAT'S WHY THEY CALL HIM THE MAN OF STEEL
Moviemakers may have to cover up Superman's lunchbox.
« Previous | Main | Next »
Moviemakers may have to cover up Superman's lunchbox.
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Camel toe?
Posted by: U.O | December 12, 2005 at 09:16 AM
Because God forbid women have something to look at.
Posted by: (_i_) | December 12, 2005 at 09:17 AM
Banana sling?
Posted by: PirateBoy | December 12, 2005 at 09:23 AM
*goes off to Google Brandon Routh*
Wait, that sounded kinda bad....
Posted by: southerngirl | December 12, 2005 at 09:52 AM
Look out for SUP-er-man!
More powerful than a locomotive, heh heh.
Posted by: TrillianAstra | December 12, 2005 at 09:57 AM
Lunch box? LUNCH box? Ew.
Posted by: mudstuffin | December 12, 2005 at 10:01 AM
Well, this is a great debut for Brandon Routh, wouldn't you say? Dang.
Posted by: Shannon | December 12, 2005 at 10:16 AM
don't worry about Googling him, s-girl, he likes it Routh...
Posted by: insomniac | December 12, 2005 at 10:22 AM
Excuse me? Isn't this the production that boasted over the summer that a costume designer spent a full month creating different molds for Superman's codpiece?
Sounds like the studio gave themselves too much of a good thing, if ya know what I mean.
Posted by: Wurm42 | December 12, 2005 at 10:23 AM
They should have hired me for the part. Wouldn't have to worry about my lunch box being too big. It's a snack pack at best....
They would have to reduce my 30 pack of abs to a six-pack, though....
Posted by: pinto | December 12, 2005 at 10:27 AM
Really, Superman just can't win in this area. And the problems go way beyond creating a jock strap strong enough to contain a kryptionian, er, package.
See Larry Niven's Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex for a painfully well thought out (and funny) description of Superman's difficulties, in, um, you know.
Posted by: Wurm42 | December 12, 2005 at 10:32 AM
size shouldn't matter as long as he's not faster than a speeding bullet.
Posted by: crossgirl | December 12, 2005 at 10:34 AM
*shakes head and sighs at Insom's Really Bad Pun*
LOL @ crossgirl!
Posted by: southerngirl | December 12, 2005 at 10:40 AM
I want this guy's press agent! Talk about "no such thing as bad publicity."
Posted by: Ken | December 12, 2005 at 10:50 AM
Apparently, he can leap tall buildings in a single bound by using a certain anatomical part to pole-vault over them.
I feel your pain, Supe baby.
And after all, how "super" can he be if he's only packin' a Vienna sausage? No credibility at all.
Posted by: Mr. Completely | December 12, 2005 at 10:57 AM
Larry Niven MoS/WoK
great short story.
I just want to know why it was called a lunch box. Up until now I thought I knew all the euphimism's for it.
Posted by: Minsc and Boo | December 12, 2005 at 11:22 AM
Oh my.
Posted by: Nannie | December 12, 2005 at 11:47 AM
We may be forced to erase his package with digital effects.
OK, is anyone else worried that THEY have developed technology allowing THEM to "erase" a "package" with "digital effects"!?!
Read between the lines, people!! If this isn't a plot for world domination, then cheeze-its aren't really made from cheese, if you get my meaning.
Don't say you haven't been warned!!
Posted by: TCK | December 12, 2005 at 11:51 AM
Oh dear. What a thing to read after working night shift. And "lunch box"? Eeeeeww! Note to self: must buy dinner at work for at least a week because giggling and snorking over dinner could be a bad idea.
Posted by: Nurse Tammy | December 12, 2005 at 11:55 AM
southerngirl/insom/Mr. C~ Thanks for giving me multiple *snorks* between finals. I needed that. :-)
Posted by: Bumble | December 12, 2005 at 12:03 PM
He doesn't look that big. to me. But then the style today for the pubescent boys is big, shaggy/baggy pants that tend to blur any and all visual reference to gender!
Posted by: Dr. Doug | December 12, 2005 at 12:31 PM
They did the same thing to King Kong, you know.
Posted by: Tamara Rhymes With Camera | December 12, 2005 at 12:45 PM
No, his lunchbox is actually a small todger:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/09/08/superman_lacking/
Superman has small todger: official
No super powers in the trouser department
By Lester Haines
It's official: Superman may be able to leap a tall building with a single bound but he's completely lacking super powers in the trouser department.
That, at least, is according to those charged with costuming Brandon Routh who will play the Man of Steel in next year's Superman Returns. According to MSNBC, costume designer Louise Mingenbach says that of all the internet speculation surrounding Superman's costume, the vast majority focused on his trunks.
Explained the deliciously-surnamed Mingenbach: "There was more discussion about Superman's 'package' than anything else on the suit. Was it too big? Was it not big enough? Was it too pointy? Too round? It was somebody's job for about a month just working on codpiece shapes. It was crazy."
The mind boggles. Just how pointy does Superman's schlong have to be before Middle America reaches for its Bible and its assault rifle?
Sadly, we may never know, because Mingenbach's final verdict on our hero's wedding tackle is: "Not big. Ten-year-olds will be seeing this movie."
Readers will be able to judge for themselves just how deprived Lois Lane is when Superman Returns opens in June next year.
Posted by: Scott | December 12, 2005 at 12:49 PM
If you'll excuse me, I'll be at the courthouse having my name legally changed to Brandon Routh
Posted by: Sarcasmo | December 12, 2005 at 12:57 PM
I hope it's not too late to point out that Superman's Lunchbox WBAGNFARB...
Posted by: Frogstein | December 12, 2005 at 01:02 PM
*snork* @ Sarcasmo!
Posted by: southerngirl | December 12, 2005 at 01:19 PM
Tamara RWC - Good point. Now I'll never be able to watch any version of that movie again.
"King Kong's Package" W NOT BAGNFARB.
Posted by: Mr. Completely | December 12, 2005 at 01:46 PM
Nice legs, even if they are blue. Better this than an Oompa Loompa, I always say.
Posted by: Reigh | December 12, 2005 at 02:12 PM
test
Posted by: Eleanor | December 12, 2005 at 04:00 PM
"Brandon is extremely well endowed and they don't want it up on the big screen."
I can certainly understand them not wanting it, UP. How about if it's in a quiescent state, you know, um, DOWN?
Posted by: Candy Tutt | December 12, 2005 at 04:04 PM
Yeah, ok, lunch box is full, his legs are extrodinary and his face is adequatly manly, but, hey, can he act?? That's the million dollar question. The lunch box is just, uh, icing on the cake.
Posted by: Annie in Texas | December 12, 2005 at 11:14 PM
Annie in Texas - Haven't you noticed? It doesn't matter if he can act or not. He's got a pretty face, good legs and is well-packaged. That's all the American public wants.
Talent is irrelevant anymore. Witness Britney, either of the Simpson chicks, Lindsay Lohan... the list goes on. And that's not counting the boys. Not a talented bone among them.
Posted by: Mr. Completely | December 13, 2005 at 12:09 AM
"Superman Returns....His Codpiece"
Mr. C - yet again, nice use of 'talented bone.'
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | December 13, 2005 at 12:54 AM
Annie W-B-H - If I had a nickel for every time I heard that... oh, wait, I bet you mean my previous post. Dang, I thought you were still watching that hidden webcam. My bad.
Posted by: Mr. Completely | December 13, 2005 at 12:58 AM
Mr. C - yes, you're VERY bad.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | December 13, 2005 at 05:36 PM
"It's a bird! It's a plane! It choked Lois Lane!"
Posted by: Adjustah | December 13, 2005 at 07:10 PM
Who put Brodie from Mallrats in charge of the PR for this movie?
Posted by: Estelle Chauvelin | December 14, 2005 at 10:13 AM