HEADLINE OF THE DAY SO FAR
This blog formally calls on Congress to take action.
« Previous | Main | Next »
This blog formally calls on Congress to take action.
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Let me be the FIRST to say...OUCH!
Posted by: casey | March 18, 2005 at 08:18 AM
Nuts - not first. Also: "Bilateral Asymmetry" wbagnfarb.
Posted by: Brainy Jello | March 18, 2005 at 08:22 AM
s'ok brainy, if you want, you can join me in the happy dance!
Posted by: casey | March 18, 2005 at 08:24 AM
I bet its Paul..He always seemed like he was short a gonad..
Posted by: Sean | March 18, 2005 at 08:25 AM
Why would anyone look to see if these guys are missing their 'stuff'
Posted by: Charlotte | March 18, 2005 at 08:25 AM
"That raises the question of how and why some beetles evolved to have just one testis. The researchers ruled out obvious factors such as flight advantages or major changes in body form."
I think the reason for one testis, is obvious. When the Beetle is in a fight, he is less likely to suffer injury when kicked in the groin. An obvious evolutionary enhancement.
Posted by: igloo | March 18, 2005 at 08:26 AM
Coming soon to Ebay: Sack of Beetle Nuts
Posted by: Christobol | March 18, 2005 at 08:27 AM
I bet these beatles are Red Sox fans who said, "I'd give my left nut if we could win the Series!" It's tough when ya gotta pay up.
Posted by: pogo | March 18, 2005 at 08:28 AM
"The researchers said that field observations such as this provide valuable clues to beetle biology and evolution."
I have been waiting my WHOLE LIFE for valuable clues to beetle biology and evolution. Thank you, thank you, thank you, for this information, I can now die peaceful and happy with the valuable knowledge that some bugs have only one testicle. Aint science a grand and awsome thing?
Posted by: casey | March 18, 2005 at 08:31 AM
Okay guys, so here's the deal. I asked the conjoined midget twin growing out of my left rib cage what she thought about bilateral symmetry, and she says it's bullcrap.
I tend to trust her; she's the smart one.
Posted by: Buddha | March 18, 2005 at 08:38 AM
. . . testes, the male gonads of insects
Uh, isn't that like, uh, true for all males? Hey, no need to get testy about it . . .
Posted by: MKJ | March 18, 2005 at 08:38 AM
When questioned on how they were able to survive despite their monocujoneism, they replied, in harmony,
"We got by with a little help from our, with a little help from our friends..."
Posted by: Esther | March 18, 2005 at 08:41 AM
Monocujoneism...I think I prefer this term to all the pretentious "science" they have out there.
Posted by: Buddha | March 18, 2005 at 08:48 AM
I told you so.
Posted by: Christobol | March 18, 2005 at 08:50 AM
also wbagnfarb. I also like Sack of Beetle Nuts.
Posted by: Esther | March 18, 2005 at 08:50 AM
I think those are Romanian beetles. Guys "stuff" tends to go missing over there.
Posted by: slyeyes | March 18, 2005 at 09:01 AM
The dummies, they misspelled "Beatle"
Posted by: Flash | March 18, 2005 at 09:25 AM
Misspellings in the news have become a trend, then. Just the other day I read an article about so-called "monkeys". Pshaw. Monkees, hello.
Posted by: Buddha | March 18, 2005 at 09:34 AM
i can't see it at all... anybody else getting an error?
Posted by: judi | March 18, 2005 at 09:47 AM
yes, i am getting an error - it says the connection was refused, or something. i have no idea how big dave's readership is, but maybe the site is currently slashdotted.
Posted by: magic8ball | March 18, 2005 at 09:51 AM
Key quote: "The beetles with one testis are mating normally and doing their beetle thing," said James Liebherr, professor of entomology at Cornell University.
Posted by: Stephen | March 18, 2005 at 09:59 AM
Here's the female humanoid version of those bugs
Posted by: Mahatma Kane Jeeves | March 18, 2005 at 10:12 AM
so if the beetles are that way normally is it a case of "constitutional monorchy"
*ducks socks of nickels*
Posted by: insomniac | March 18, 2005 at 10:21 AM
"It may be that the male beetles are similarly providing other things than sperm to the females. But it's a chicken and egg question. We don't know what came first. Was the testis lost first, leaving more space for the accessory glands to grow? Or did the testis lose out to make way for a larger accessory gland? That's a subject for further study."
Heck, even I might give one up for a "larger accessory gland", or whatever it is the kids are calling it nowadays.....
Posted by: Russell | March 18, 2005 at 11:00 AM
"occurred 90 to 100 million years ago"
And they're just now noticing? But then, it took my Dad 3 years to notice that Mom had repainted the dining room -- a different color. Must be a y-chromosome thing -- or a slow news day.
Posted by: mama723 | March 18, 2005 at 11:01 AM
And that knowledge helps me how????
Posted by: julietine | March 18, 2005 at 11:18 AM
*overheard at beetle nightclubs*
Hey, baby, did you give up a teste for a larger accessory gland, or are you just happy to see me?
Posted by: rhealist | March 18, 2005 at 11:25 AM
I didn't think the Beatles were missing any testicles; I thought they were missing lead and rythm guitar.
Posted by: Gullyborg | March 18, 2005 at 11:42 AM
Yet another example of scientist who have waaaaaaay to much time on their hands. That or they have some strange beetle fetish.
Posted by: opiesgirl | March 18, 2005 at 07:56 PM
"One Testicle Short" WBAGNFA country song.
Posted by: AlanBoss | March 18, 2005 at 09:07 PM
Obviously this researcher has never seen "South Pacific", or her would know why the beetle's are missing testicles..... Blody Mary is chewing them!!!
Posted by: Broadway | March 19, 2005 at 05:22 AM