THE FEDS IN SOUTH FLORIDA
Soft on crime? No way.
(Thanks to many people)
« Previous | Main | Next »
Soft on crime? No way.
(Thanks to many people)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
First
Posted by: Rosella | June 21, 2004 at 07:14 AM
I can only visualize the federal agents as clones of Yogi Bear.
Posted by: waxwing | June 21, 2004 at 07:19 AM
so, bloglits do not like stupid puns.
Posted by: judi | June 21, 2004 at 07:21 AM
They should've made her write an apology with her own blood like they do in other places
Posted by: Mahatma Kane Jeeves | June 21, 2004 at 07:36 AM
judi, this is not so, I heard many a chortle
Posted by: Mahatma Kane Jeeves | June 21, 2004 at 07:44 AM
LEG SHACKLES?!
WTF?! She was a flight risk? And over a $50 fine?!
Man, I know people with more than that in parking fines. Gosh, when they're found, a SWAT team might be necessary.
I think the appropriate "corrective action" is for the U.S. Attorney to be required to find EVERYONE aboard that ship and apologize for their behavior towards this woman. After all, aren't you innocent until proven guilty?
What's the proper category for this story? CREEPING FASCISM
Key quote "We were acting on what we believed was accurate information." Problem is, does their “action” fit the “information”? Not here it doesn’t!
*steps off bee(a)r crate*
Posted by: kibby F5 | June 21, 2004 at 07:56 AM
This is what I'm on about. I want to go live in an anarcho-syndicalist commune.
Posted by: Boo Augustus | June 21, 2004 at 08:02 AM
somebody better tell tom ridge what people are doing out there. imagine. marshmallows. gives new meaning to the term 'intelligence'.
Posted by: queensbee | June 21, 2004 at 08:12 AM
She was lucky, if she had also left out a hot dog, she would be facing the death penalty.
Posted by: DNC | June 21, 2004 at 08:12 AM
"Suppression of the Masses!" and “Who voted YOU King?”
Posted by: kibby F5 | June 21, 2004 at 08:13 AM
Bloody peasants!
Posted by: mudstuffin | June 21, 2004 at 08:18 AM
"Strange women, lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!"
Posted by: Tetsu | June 21, 2004 at 08:33 AM
I see this spining of to a MP thread.....
Posted by: kibby F5 | June 21, 2004 at 08:40 AM
I am the bloglit who says : N E E E E E !
Posted by: queensbee | June 21, 2004 at 09:29 AM
Bring us.... a shrubbery!!!
Posted by: Mike Weasel | June 21, 2004 at 10:24 AM
..........I push the pram alot.....
Posted by: queensbee | June 21, 2004 at 10:54 AM
"We were acting on what we believed was accurate information."
Gee, we seem to be hearing this a lot lately....
Posted by: jamester | June 21, 2004 at 11:05 AM
I got it Judi: marshmallows...soft on crime.
The Judge wasn't Smokey the Bear by any chance?
Or this guy?
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | June 21, 2004 at 11:29 AM
and, even if I don't have accurate information, I can put in shackels, keep you in jail and tell the judge to bring you back to court because of our "discrepancies."
Posted by: John | June 21, 2004 at 02:08 PM
and, even if I don't have accurate information, I can put in shackels, keep you in jail and tell the judge to bring you back to court because of our "discrepancies."
Posted by: John | June 21, 2004 at 02:08 PM
...before she left Yellowstone, which has strict rules about food storage to prevent wildlife from eating human food.
God forbid a member of the wildlife community be found in the predicament of trying to figure out what to do with a half-eaten bag of Cheetos.
Posted by: D'Artagnan | June 21, 2004 at 02:23 PM
Actually, Jeff, Boss Hogg was dipped in chocolate and sold as a delicacy in the Unkraine.
Posted by: Kiki B. | June 21, 2004 at 10:26 PM