WHOA
It's a good thing we didn't have the Internet back in the Sixties.
(Via Mr. James Lileks)
« Previous | Main | Next »
It's a good thing we didn't have the Internet back in the Sixties.
(Via Mr. James Lileks)
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
That is just too fun. Next time try drugs.
Posted by: Itsok | May 06, 2004 at 08:52 AM
That is EXTREMELY cool.
Posted by: LMC | May 06, 2004 at 08:53 AM
Okay, this one needs a warning. Not to be viewed when nursing a hangover.
Posted by: elfbrains | May 06, 2004 at 08:56 AM
whoa.
Posted by: MOTW | May 06, 2004 at 08:56 AM
Wow. He has a lot of twins.
Posted by: Graz | May 06, 2004 at 08:57 AM
Why couldn't he have put a hot chick in the picture instead of himself? That's way too many of THAT guy.
Posted by: Jeff | May 06, 2004 at 08:59 AM
Oh, wow... do NOT view after eating a large, lemon-dressed salad.
Whooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooaaa...
Posted by: Katie Sue | May 06, 2004 at 09:00 AM
That is not exactly what I would consider a hypnotizing image.
Posted by: Genevieve | May 06, 2004 at 09:03 AM
I'm flyyyyyyyyyying.
Posted by: Garret | May 06, 2004 at 09:07 AM
Punky, make it stop. MAKE IT STOP!!!
Posted by: Garret | May 06, 2004 at 09:08 AM
And the Internet took away your permission slip, punky (according to your link). Now go to your room!
Posted by: Garret | May 06, 2004 at 09:15 AM
Acid flashback! Shit Dave, you really freaked me out there. For a second I could have sworn it was my brother Ken, but Ken has less hair.
Damn Punky, what did you have a craving for? I was FORBIDDEN to see it all 11 times.
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | May 06, 2004 at 09:33 AM
"Shadow and darkness, wisit me at night, here in the backroom of my mind. Shadow and darkness, wisit me at night, here in the backroom of my mind. Shadow and darkness, wisit me at night, here in the backroom of my mind. Shadow and darkness, wisit me at night, here in the backroom of my mind. Shadow and darkness, wisit me at night, here in the backroom of my mind."
Posted by: BMX3 | May 06, 2004 at 09:34 AM
Sorry to ask such a stupid question, but what was this image everybody's "whoaing" about? My computer said "swirl." And that's it. Descriptive Video please.
Sorry, images don't translate well for blind people, but I have sighted friends I might want to send it to, once I know what it is.
SMFTC
Posted by: SMFTC | May 06, 2004 at 09:38 AM
SMFTC: It's my brother Ken's lookalike (hippieish looking guy with a beard, t-shirt and jeans and glasses) kneeling on a rug holding a mirror (?) showing him holding a mirror showing him holding a mirror showing him, ad infinitum. Or maybe it's not a mirror, just a picture of him. Anyway, the picture gets closer and closer, then the picture inside gets closer. Then the picture inside that gets closer. Then, "shadow and darkness, wisit you at night..." Sorry about that.
I still want to know what Punky was craving.
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | May 06, 2004 at 09:47 AM
BMX3: Wisit?
Posted by: mudstuffin | May 06, 2004 at 09:47 AM
It's... it's, well, hard to describe but I'll give it a short, SMFTC. It's a picture of a guy, holding what is presumably a mirror reflecting an image from ANOTHER mirror, such that it's unending reflections of the guy sitting there. But to make it more interesting, the whole thing swirls around, and the reflections come toward you, and it's very much like drugs.
Posted by: theresa | May 06, 2004 at 09:48 AM
whoops - jeff's description is better, SMFTC, in addition to beating me to the punch.
Posted by: theresa | May 06, 2004 at 09:50 AM
I think I sorta get it, in as much as a blind person who has never seen can get such things. I believe in the radio world we call that Feedback. For an audio version of this, try placing the ear piece of your cell phone against the mouth piece of your landline, then call one phone with the other and talk into it. That is, if you're bored and have nothing to do some time. I have to get back to my work--or my website--or something.
Posted by: SMFTC | May 06, 2004 at 09:56 AM
Hmm. Makes describing it rather tough when you realize you have no visual context for a picture or a mirror.
Every once in a while, something hits you in the head and humbles you.
Posted by: Garret | May 06, 2004 at 10:06 AM
LOL Punky, that takes the cake for multiple postings. Another first!
Posted by: D'Artagnan | May 06, 2004 at 10:31 AM
I love Lileks! This is great. It's like finding out two good friends already know each other so now you can all hang out. Of course I don't actually know either one of them.
Nevermind.
Posted by: Smoodle | May 06, 2004 at 10:36 AM
Who cares what games we choose?
Little to win & nothing to lose...
(cue guitar solo, lava lamp, strobe light on Silver Sufer poster, etc)
Posted by: lurker | May 06, 2004 at 10:38 AM
Brad, you should go back to calling yourself "Brad from SMFTC" instead of "SMFTC" because "SMFTC" is too doggone hard to remember.
I'm just sayin'...
Also, let me add my "WHOA!" to the general chorus. Wonder how that thing would go with alcohol.
Posted by: Blogchik | May 06, 2004 at 10:38 AM
SuRRRRRRRfer.
Silver SuRfer.
/hangs comic book geek head in shame.
Posted by: lurker | May 06, 2004 at 10:39 AM
Brad: Audio feedback is a great analogy, buddy.
Posted by: Con | May 06, 2004 at 11:06 AM
Blogchik & pixie: A note for you on the Performance Art comments thread :)
Posted by: Con | May 06, 2004 at 11:13 AM
Many tanks. I guess I failed to wisit that site the first time.
Posted by: mudstuffin | May 06, 2004 at 11:22 AM
Audio Feedback WBAGNFARB!
Posted by: BMX3 | May 06, 2004 at 11:32 AM
Looking at that makes me feel like puking. I'm not sure if it's because of the swirling effect or that guy.
Posted by: Bryce | May 06, 2004 at 11:38 AM
Wonder how that thing would go with alcohol.
Posted by: Blogchik on May 6, 2004 02:38 PM
WHOA!
Posted by: Ernie G | May 06, 2004 at 11:59 AM
Thanks Con!
Posted by: evil little pixie | May 06, 2004 at 01:01 PM
The effect is better if you hit F11 to make your screen bigger.
Posted by: Momanon | May 06, 2004 at 01:05 PM
Just a clarification for folks who see that as a reflection-of-a-reflection (or portrait-of-a-portrait) visual feedback loop; it's much more clever than that. This guy is right up there with Escher for diddling with your brain and breaking the laws of perspective - see how the outer frame isn't just a single rectangle enclosing the whole picture, but it spirals inward so that the bottom edge of one picture angles inward to become the bottom edge of the next inner picture, and so on in one seamless continuous blend. For the life of me I can't figure oot how he does that. There must be some point at which the end of the film loop, as it were, matches the beginning but I can't see where that can happen... not with that frame flowing smoothly from one image to the next. Like, wow, eh.
Posted by: Artistic Savant | May 06, 2004 at 02:29 PM
The effect is better if you hit F11 to make your screen bigger.
Dang, I keep hitting F11 and my screen is still the same 17" it always was. Is this another one of those screen enlargement scams?
Posted by: Artistic Savant | May 06, 2004 at 02:31 PM
There is a discontinuity in the lower right corner and a smaller one in the upper left corner. I can kind of imagine how the frame must have been distorted. How he manages to get that trippy loop going still baffles me.
I am getting sleeeepy, veeeery sleeeepy. At the count of 3, I will remember nothing of of the bearded man's production secrets. 1.. 2.. 3..
Dang, now what was I posting about?
Posted by: nemo | May 06, 2004 at 06:15 PM
Con, I found it. Many thanks. :)
Posted by: Blogchik | May 07, 2004 at 06:06 AM
Good one Artistic Savant. Your comment had me LOL (and that doesn't happen often).
Posted by: FirstTimeCaller | May 07, 2004 at 07:46 AM
Whoa! DO NOT veiw this while listening to Beatallica!
Posted by: alanboss | May 07, 2004 at 08:31 PM
Woof...we didn't need the internet back in the 60s...
Posted by: BigMur | May 08, 2004 at 09:26 AM
Lileks is an old hippie....and glorious....NOT the Katie Sue from previous postings.....bet he's the Joni Mitchell album that's required... for old hippies~
Posted by: Eykis (self-annointed Dave Blog paralegal)) | May 08, 2004 at 02:20 PM
*bet he's got the Miles of Aisles album...
Posted by: Eykis (self-annointed Dave Blog paralegal)) | May 08, 2004 at 02:22 PM